Search Fishin.com |
A vote for Mitch McConnell is a vote to do away with your social security as Mitch favors privatization of social security.
Mitch the party of NO!
Mitch the Chief Obstructionist.
Mitch the guy who shut down the US Government and cost you all money.
Go take your prozac...........
Wow!! You are totally lost. I find it very hard to believe you are real. I'm convinced you are one of the banned nimrods of past that just trolls by to plant little snippets of ignorance to get attention.
Privatization of SS is a good idea, the federal government will eventually bankrupt it anyway.
Party of NO! to Dimocrat policies...a very good thing.
Mitch the chief obstructionist to Dimocrat policies...also a very good thing.
Harry Reid shut down the government, not Mitch...the only positive result he's achieved in his whole miserable career. Hopefully his senile wacky ass is out of the SML chair after today. He and Nancy Pelosi can get together and figure out nonsensical things to tell the press.
Any other weak trolls?
Uhhhhhhhhhh....uhhhhhhhhh where are YOOOOUUUUUU??? HAHAHAHAHA!!! Hello???
mhall liked this post
Yep............my returns on my 401k will out pace my returns on Social Security. I've been putting the same amount into each for about the same amount of time. It is UNREAL what my personal retirement nest egg will be compared to that SOCIALIST hunk of **** called Social Security.
Now, don't get me wrong, I will take every RED cent of Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security that I DESERVE, because I've been paying into that black hole of socialism since 1983.........
There is no social security the democrats stole it.
GeoFisher liked this post
Understand broker fees? The commision remains even if the trade loses money. With out over sight, they would bank rupty SS in no time.Remember junk bonds? How about the mortgage scam, that was private enterprise. Of course most bankers are as honest as lawyers.Sure politicians steal,everyone to some extent, knows a "good "deal, and would take it. Viet nam was paid for by a lot of social security money. WW2 had war bonds saving stamps, taxes.Yes LBJ used SS funds, but dont forget ronnie used them also,for his agenda.
I agree with most everything however what I was referring to the democrats are the ones that opened the lock box. All congress and presidents used SS funds after that. As far as my 401K it has done much better for me than the money I put into SS I think it might be better to put a percentage of SS in a stock market fund as big as this would be you would be investing in institutional funds and this would keep commission fees very low. I also think having this much money in the bond and stock market it would help keep the market from the wild ups and downs. It would also be good for the economy having a huge pool of money invested in America.Understand broker fees? The commision remains even if the trade loses money. With out over sight, they would bank rupty SS in no time.Remember junk bonds? How about the mortgage scam, that was private enterprise. Of course most bankers are as honest as lawyers.Sure politicians steal,everyone to some extent, knows a "good "deal, and would take it. Viet nam was paid for by a lot of social security money. WW2 had war bonds saving stamps, taxes.Yes LBJ used SS funds, but dont forget ronnie used them also,for his agenda.
I also think we should put all SS money back into a lock box today.