Originally Posted by
ON3 3Y3D WILLI3
The bottom line is that lead is not good (and not just in California.) Why would we, as outdoor enthusiasts, want to gripe about continuing to use a product that will eventually have a negative effect on the areas we love so much? It's 2009 people, saving the planet is not just for hippies anymore. Coming from supposed outdoorsmen, I find it pretty ironic that there would be a negative connotation to the term tree-hugger. Despite all of these deep-seeded beliefs about what we think is fact, right, or wrong isn't it time to take a look at the small things we as a community can do to help our sport and not worry about the billion dollar tackle industry and their lobbyists the ASA. If the sign says, No Lead why in the heck would anyone argue with that? When it says No Fishing, or simply No Fish, then you'll really be upset.
"but if I'm fishing a bank where I know I've hung up in the past, don't put it by me to put a lead weight on my line!" Sad. Kind of like saying don't put it by me to paint that school with lead-based paint eventhough I ain't supposed too. Who are you showing up by this behaviour? Heck, I use lead just like the next guy and will continue to carefully do so in the areas that allow it. I just can't understand griping about not using it in places that have banned it. Banning it is a good thing, but as with most things it is short-sighted and developers need to come up with an equally affordable and functional alternative.
I hate anything political and I hate the government. This issue is about the environment; and hippie, treehugger, or water sprite, I do care about the environment.