Search Fishin.com

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 13 to 22 of 22
  1. #13
    jgj Guest

    You never know

    Quote Originally Posted by first2fish View Post
    I dont see how he could be fined,there hasnt been wolf in kentucky since the 1800's so im sure he thought it to be a coyote. I dont think he will be fined for shooting a protected animal that there has been no sighting of in kentucky for over a century---but thats just my opinion--maybe kfwd will look at it differently
    If you can get warned about looking at a deer in your own driveway in the city limits of a rural town with a maglight and no firearm that is not locked in a safe,then I would not be surprised at anything. It was considered wildlife harrassment.

  2. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Evansville
    Posts
    591
    Post Thanks / Like
    If he cant notice a difference between a wolf and a coyote I'm not sure he should be shooting anything. Unless it was a juvenile wolf, there is a enormous size and color difference. Lol

  3. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Leitchfield, Ky
    Posts
    79
    Post Thanks / Like
    I heard at work today that they suspect in may have been kept in captivity, due to large build up of tattar on it's teeth. I guess if it was feed and didn't hunt that might happen. Kind of like what happens to your dog.

  4. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,004
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by maximus21 View Post
    I heard at work today that they suspect in may have been kept in captivity, due to large build up of tattar on it's teeth. I guess if it was feed and didn't hunt that might happen. Kind of like what happens to your dog.

    That would certainly make sense, and answer how he got here.

  5. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Frankfort
    Posts
    2,056
    Post Thanks / Like
    I was told that DNA testing traces the wolf to Yellowstone. Migrated or brought here, no one knows...

  6. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    KY
    Posts
    2,057
    Post Thanks / Like
    I agree with others that if you're not 100% absolutely sure of what you're shooting, don't shoot it.

  7. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    218
    Post Thanks / Like
    Kdfw said it was probably a captive wolf on Kentucky Afield call on show

  8. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Palestine, Illinois, USA.
    Posts
    1,733
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by first2fish View Post
    I dont see how he could be fined,there hasnt been wolf in kentucky since the 1800's so im sure he thought it to be a coyote. I dont think he will be fined for shooting a protected animal that there has been no sighting of in kentucky for over a century---but thats just my opinion--maybe kfwd will look at it differently
    The article said the biologist were skeptical and had to have DNA to prove it was a wolf so I would think they would be hard pressed to bring charges against the shooter.

  9. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Louisville. KY
    Posts
    2,970
    Post Thanks / Like
    A little more info form KDFWR



    Federal officials confirm gray wolf taken in Kentucky

    Federal officials recently confirmed that an animal taken by a hunter near Munfordville in Hart County on March 16 is a gray wolf.

    A DNA analysis performed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Wildlife Research Center in Colorado determined the 73-pound animal was a federally endangered gray wolf with a genetic makeup resembling wolves native to the Great Lakes Region. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Forensics Laboratory in Oregon confirmed the finding.

    How the wolf found its way to a Munfordville hay ridge at daybreak in March remains a mystery. Wolves have been gone from the state since the mid-1800s.

    Great Lakes Region wolf biologists said the animal's dental characteristics - a large amount of plaque on its teeth - suggest it may have spent some time in captivity. A largely carnivorous diet requiring the crushing of bone as they eat produces much less plaque on the teeth of wild wolves.

    Hart County resident James Troyer took the animal with a shot from 100 yards away while predator hunting on his family's farm. Troyer, 31, said he had taken a coyote off the property just two weeks earlier.

    But when he approached the downed animal he noticed it was much larger. "I was like - wow - that thing was big!" he recalled. "It looked like a wolf, but who is going to believe I shot a wolf?"

    Because a free-ranging wolf has not been seen in the state for more than a century, biologists were skeptical at first. However, wildlife officials were aware that a few radio-collared northern wolves have wandered as far south as Missouri in the past decade.

    Wolves resemble coyotes, except they are much larger. From a distance, the size difference is difficult to determine.

    Troyer convinced Kevin Raymond, a wildlife biologist for the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, to look at the animal. Once Raymond saw the animal was twice the size of a coyote, he contacted furbearer biologist Laura Patton, who submitted samples to federal officials for DNA testing.

    Because state and federal laws prohibit the possession, importation into Kentucky or hunting of gray wolves, federal officials took possession of the pelt. Since this is the first free-ranging gray wolf documented in Kentucky's modern history, federal or state charges are not expected because there were no prior biological expectations for any hunter to encounter a wolf.

  10. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    mt. washington, kentucky.
    Posts
    698
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by peter View Post
    A little more info form KDFWR



    Federal officials confirm gray wolf taken in Kentucky

    Federal officials recently confirmed that an animal taken by a hunter near Munfordville in Hart County on March 16 is a gray wolf.

    A DNA analysis performed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Wildlife Research Center in Colorado determined the 73-pound animal was a federally endangered gray wolf with a genetic makeup resembling wolves native to the Great Lakes Region. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Forensics Laboratory in Oregon confirmed the finding.

    How the wolf found its way to a Munfordville hay ridge at daybreak in March remains a mystery. Wolves have been gone from the state since the mid-1800s.

    Great Lakes Region wolf biologists said the animal's dental characteristics - a large amount of plaque on its teeth - suggest it may have spent some time in captivity. A largely carnivorous diet requiring the crushing of bone as they eat produces much less plaque on the teeth of wild wolves.

    Hart County resident James Troyer took the animal with a shot from 100 yards away while predator hunting on his family's farm. Troyer, 31, said he had taken a coyote off the property just two weeks earlier.

    But when he approached the downed animal he noticed it was much larger. "I was like - wow - that thing was big!" he recalled. "It looked like a wolf, but who is going to believe I shot a wolf?"

    Because a free-ranging wolf has not been seen in the state for more than a century, biologists were skeptical at first. However, wildlife officials were aware that a few radio-collared northern wolves have wandered as far south as Missouri in the past decade.

    Wolves resemble coyotes, except they are much larger. From a distance, the size difference is difficult to determine.

    Troyer convinced Kevin Raymond, a wildlife biologist for the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, to look at the animal. Once Raymond saw the animal was twice the size of a coyote, he contacted furbearer biologist Laura Patton, who submitted samples to federal officials for DNA testing.

    Because state and federal laws prohibit the possession, importation into Kentucky or hunting of gray wolves, federal officials took possession of the pelt. Since this is the first free-ranging gray wolf documented in Kentucky's modern history, federal or state charges are not expected because there were no prior biological expectations for any hunter to encounter a wolf.
    so next time I am dove hunting, and think I see huge dove, shoot it, and rdealize its a bald eagle, are they going to let me go becase bald eagles arent common where I am from? If you dont know what your shooting dont shoot!

Similar Threads

  1. US Ambassador to Libya Killed!
    By RoadToad in forum "Off Topic" Posts
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-14-2012, 07:11 PM
  2. We're SORRY we killed your MURDEROUS son.....
    By GeoFisher in forum "Off Topic" Posts
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-15-2011, 02:42 PM
  3. Drought broken in Southern IN Vanderburgh County and Warrick County
    By Moveon in forum Indiana Discussion Board
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-30-2011, 12:31 PM
  4. Fulton County vs. Calloway County football fight
    By Tim_T in forum "Off Topic" Posts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-09-2009, 09:20 AM
  5. This will get our TROOPS killed.
    By GeoFisher in forum "Off Topic" Posts
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-14-2009, 08:54 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •