Good point, but you forget many other factors. First, the walleye in the former Cumberland River were river strain, meaning they were much more hardy than lake fish (pretty much, lake fish are sissy fish....they dont know how to control themselves in extreme temps, currents, etc.).
Don't forget, the Cumberland River is a DEEP river. I wouldnt be suprised if there are a few 30-40 ft. holes in the former river. This is plenty water to hold walleye (remember, Nolin and Green, realitivly shallow lakes, hold good populations of walleye). On top of that, rivers seldom get above 75 degrees, even in the hottest of summers, due to the constant running water. Plenty cold for walleye.
However, were still talking LAKE cumberland, not cumberland river. The lake, although still one of the deepest in the state, will be much shallower, with much more stained water with the constant influx and flushing, and will make the lake much warmer. The fishery is going to HURT, bigtime, but I dont think it's going to kill the fishery as some are thinking.


Reply With Quote