The only one of those I use Flouro on is C-rig. I wouldn't consider it on topwater (it sinks). I have had this discussion with Dave Stewart on numerous occasions - and he has said there is no need for Flouro on this lake. I think it is finally starting to sink in. The water here isn't clear enough to warrant Flouro (invisibility is flouro's primary benefit). I do feel like it has a better feel - more so on lighter lines, however, the sensitivity benefit starts to balance out about 15 pounds. Some say it has less stretch. Again it is the same. You can tell a huge difference in 8# flouro and 8# copolymer, but once you get up around 12# the stretch is the same.
The biggest downside of Flouro is it is useless once it is knicked up. Around here we are dragging through rocks and it eats through the flouro. 20 # flouro with the slightest knick in it is as useless as fishing with 2 pound line. A good copolymer like gamma is as tough as nails.
I am going to be trashing some flouro this week for some gamma. I fished a tournament this past weekend, and was out caught 5 to 1 becaus of flouro. We were fishing around stump beds up on flats marked with some rebarb. My partner was using standard mono, he freed and boated several fish that was wrapped around the rebarb. I never landed a fish that came close to the rebarb. If the flouro slightly grazed the rebarb it was shredded. I am also tired of re-tying my jigs every 10 casts because the rocks had been snacking on the flouro.
Dave - you were right and I was wrong. I should have known a guy who spends a couple hundred days a year on the water would know a thing or two about fishing here.



Reply With Quote
that will pull a semi through some rocks.