
Originally Posted by
MrSplitshot
I also don't claim to be anything but confused on this deal, but the notion of the government regulating the "maximum" amount that some stuffed shirt who runs a company can make bothers me a little bit...but at the same time, the thought of the government bailing out some company that failed while the CEO walks away or gets to keep a job making millions bothers me too.
Neither seems "right" to me at the core, so it's a toss up. I think everything coming to a head 40 days from a Presidential Election is making things worse, because both sides are using it as a focus point for political pot-shots.
Nobody's there to bail me out when I've mismanaged my money during the month, bought too much fishing stuff at Backwaters, and can't afford to pay my electric bill. It's my fault - Maybe I should have to sit there in the dark with my new spinning rod and read Bassmaster by candlelight. I wouldn't expect DJD and Devils Horse and Mhall to take some extra money out of their paychecks to pay my electric bill for me. Maybe that's too simple a way to look at it, but maybe it's not.
Bottom line: You aint going to pay Paul without robbing from Peter. I'm afraid our messed up government is the kind that will rob from Peter, then write a cold check to Paul.