Reply With QuoteI didnt get past the picture, she has a perfect body!
| Search Fishin.com |
Senior Member
Google Michelle Obama and Fraud........
And you will FIND out why...........HM.
Later,
Geo
Senior Member
I didnt get past the picture, she has a perfect body!
Senior Member
Once you find out what type of law she practiced in the FIRST place you will really be HONKED off.....
Senior Member
I read she was disbarred for insurance fraud.And that is the wife of your President.
Senior Member
Haha yep this family and their road to the oval office will be a big documentary oneday on the fleecng of america.Originally Posted by Big Gills
I read she was disbarred for insurance fraud.
They were surrounded by crooks and always have a cloud of corruption around them...at some point people have to realize how sad it is that he was voted in....
Senior Member
Voluntary inactivation of the license was what I kept reading. I googled and didn't come up with anything more concrete than that. Care to provide a link?
Senior Member
I did the Google search. Maybe your results are different from mine, but most of the links I get are to discussion boards, with about half the people saying she was disbarred, and the other half saying they're full of crap. Not a shred of credible evidence on either side. So I poked around some more on my own. Finally I found a detailed explanation of why her license to practice law is in "court-ordered inactive status." Turns out that, at the time, the only way you could get your license set to inactive was to get a court order, so she herself initiated the process, and got the order. It's a common practice among lawyers who decide to leave the practice of law. In fact it's become so common that they've streamlined the process, so now it doesn't require a court order any more. And it is in no way an indication of wrongdoing on the part of the attorney in question.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105998
Have you guys ever seen a conspiracy theory you didn't believe?
Senior Member
Darn Toad,and they just got this BS rollin good you sure know how to spoil a good lynchin.
Senior Member
Ok.........per your OWN post.......
James Grogan, deputy administrator and chief counsel for the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, or ARDC, has been with the commission for 30 years. He told WND that on July 1, 1994, the Illinois Supreme Court entered an order allowing Michelle to be transferred to inactive status pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court rule 770.
So........just WHAT is RULE 770..........well according to this website..........from the ILLINOIS supreme COURT.......it is BAD.....
http://www.state.il.us/court/Supreme...II.htm#Rule770
Rule 770. Types of Discipline
Conduct of attorneys which violates the Code of Professional Responsibility Rules of Professional Conduct contained in article VIII of these rules or which tends to defeat the administration of justice or to bring the courts or the legal profession into disrepute shall be grounds for discipline by the court. Discipline of attorneys may be:
(a) disbarment;
(b) disbarment on consent;
(c) suspension for a specified period and until further order of court;
(d) suspension for a specified period of time;
(e) suspension until further order of the court;
(f) suspension for a specified period of time or until further order of the court with probation;
(g) censure; or
(h) reprimand by the court, the Review Board or a hearing panel.
Adopted May 26, 1978, effective July 1, 1978; amended June 3, 1980, effective July 1, 1980; amended August 9, 1983, effective October 1, 1983; amended October 13, 1989, effective immediately; amended and renumbered March 23, 2004, effective April 1, 2004.
HM.......
Senior Member
Wow, I've seen things taken out of context before, but this on takes the cake! here's what you snipped out of the article:
"James Grogan, deputy administrator and chief counsel for the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, or ARDC, has been with the commission for 30 years. He told WND that on July 1, 1994, the Illinois Supreme Court entered an order allowing Michelle to be transferred to inactive status pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court rule 770."
Here's the rest of the story (emphasis mine):
The ARDC website explains, "Prior to November 1, 1999, former Supreme Court Rule 770 provided for a proceeding in the Court for any voluntary transfer to inactive status, whether because of some incapacitating condition or solely as a matter of the lawyer's preference because the lawyer would not be practicing law."
Grogan explained, "At the time, the only way to go on inactive status was to do what she did – which was to file a petition in the Illinois Supreme Court."
CURRENT Supreme Court Rule 770 is bad.
FORMER Supreme Court Rule 770, not so much.
HM What??
Senior Member
I'm still not convinced..........
If she simply wanted to NOT practice law, that could have been handled via the Bar Association.
Lets, See.........Harvard Educated Lawyer (who took the bar 2 times), works for one of the best firms in Chicago, then goes to work for Daly, one of the most corrupt persons EVER in politics.
THEN a year later, she decides to not renew her law license.........and uses 770 as a smoke screen................THEN 1 year later, they start looking into changing the 770 statute to be more CLEAR.
HM.
Yea, I wonder.
Later,
Geo
Senior Member
What facts point to the belief that she used it as a smoke screen? What if it was indeed based solely on the knowledge that she wouldn't be practicing law in the future?
Posting Permissions