Dude come on. Thats not what he said and if you ever watched him you would know or pick up on his sarcastic ways. Whats the point in tossing bombs like this??

| Search Fishin.com |
hmmmmm....
Glen Beck gets F'ing PO when 911 truthers call his radio show. He has called them everything from tinfoil hats to crazy goons that "will kill the president", if I remember correctly.
Now check the guy out.
I haven't seen this episode. Just the part in the link. Don't know how deep he goes into govt sponsored terrorism.
Beck claims the left is "setting up another Oklahoma City," which will be blamed on him
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201011080039
Dude come on. Thats not what he said and if you ever watched him you would know or pick up on his sarcastic ways. Whats the point in tossing bombs like this??
Beck is trying to scare his audience while attempting to proove his point by quoting sources from the 1700s. Enough said.![]()
I'm not sure which is more ridiculous, the guy Beck quotes (Mark Penn) or Beck's response. IMHO neither is worth paying attention to.
lol, sorry dude. Im confused here.
He claims that "they are setting up another Ok City" in the vid in the link. Unless that is the sarcasm your talking about?
Now here is Fox News again very recently. The Geraldo show talking about Building 7 and the organization "Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth."(although he doesn't say their full name, just says 1300 architects and engineers) Geraldo says he is much more open minded about all this now.
Here is the Geraldo show part.
What About Building #7 At The WTC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjeP2wb-5SI&feature=sub
Just want to say thanks to yall for putting up with my posts. I'm pretty sure a lot of ya get PO at them.
I'm a member of two other forums, one for camaros and one for Ford trucks. This is only one where people are allowed to talk politics etc,,,
Thanks
Last edited by Catfish Bob; 11-14-2010 at 01:00 AM.
I'm not convinced at all on this bldg #7 collapse being an inside job. It's just another conspiracy theory people love to dig up.
This thing about 1300 Arch/Engineers agreeing with them doesn't hold water. There are too many Engineer classifications out there. Which ones are actually involved? Same goes for Architects, what are their qualifications? Interior design? Landscape?
For example.....the Mechanical Engineer that spoke in the clip could be building engines or HVAC units so what gives him any better insight? Nothing does.
Architects hire Engineers such as Structural, Electrical, Mechanical, Geo Thermal and such to start a project and they get into the details of the project within their own disciplines. These Engineers report to the Arch and together they see if the Architects buildings "design" works with all thats needed per code, customer wants and needs. If not they recommend changes and so goes the process(short version of what actually happens) So what I'm saying is that right off the bat I'm poo pooing their claim of experts.
Get some Structural or demolition Engineers that specialize in this sort of thing and then talk. Get the evidence from on site investigations. Get some real proof from them......Why get an Architect involved? They build alot more projects than ones that get demolished so what value would that have? I could go on but you get my point. Who are the experts? Show their credentials and let them explain it.
It's gonna take alot more info for me to even turn the corner on my opinion of another conspiracy......
Last edited by DJD; 11-14-2010 at 09:21 AM.
