John Kerry is Laying out the REASONS for an Attack

[GeoFisher]

We will be destroying serious **** in Syria.........probably today.

It is a very serious speech from Secretary of State Kerry......

Later,

Geo

[Devils Horse]

STF out of Syria!

[fishin350]

Agree stay out!!!!!

[jcb]

Sorry Darfur, Mexico, and North Korea, you don't matter, but dang lets save this country that has 19% literacy, ruled by theocracy, challenged by Al Qaeda, and is ZERO threat to us.

[GeoFisher]

Sorry Darfur, Mexico, and North Korea, you don't matter, but dang lets save this country that has 19% literacy, ruled by theocracy, challenged by Al Qaeda, and is ZERO threat to us.

North Korea saber rattles.
Mexico. I don't understand your point.
Darfur....no strategic reason. Yea, from a humanitarian point we should have intervened.

Syria.......they have chemical weapons, and are in bed with groups that WANT to destroy America. WTF do you not understand about that.......Again, North Korea rattles all the time, but Radical Muslims strap on bombs and KILL people, or jump on planes with box cutters and KILL people......but I guess that is completely OK with you.

WE sure the hell forget quickly, don't we.

If it was up to me, I'd turn the entire region to GLASS.......

Later,

Geo

[jcb]

North Korea saber rattles.
Mexico. I don't understand your point.
Darfur....no strategic reason. Yea, from a humanitarian point we should have intervened.

Syria.......they have chemical weapons, and are in bed with groups that WANT to destroy America. WTF do you not understand about that.......Again, North Korea rattles all the time, but Radical Muslims strap on bombs and KILL people, or jump on planes with box cutters and KILL people......but I guess that is completely OK with you.

WE sure the hell forget quickly, don't we.

If it was up to me, I'd turn the entire region to GLASS.......

Later,

Geo

So, to retaliate for 9/11 and the chemical weapons use, try to topple the regime, opening the door for a takeover by...the guys responsible for 9/11. Makes sense to me.

As for 9/11, no, I still remember. I also remember Iraq. I sure am glad those folks were so grateful to us for toppling Saddam that democracy bloomed, and spread across the region like all those smart guys in D.C. said it would, aren't you?

[greenriverman1]

We will be destroying serious **** in Syria.........probably today.

It is a very serious speech from Secretary of State Kerry......

Later,

Geo

We need to stay the hell out of this. We can not even govern America much less the world.

[MrSplitshot]

So, to retaliate for 9/11 and the chemical weapons use, try to topple the regime, opening the door for a takeover by...the guys responsible for 9/11. Makes sense to me.

No, no, no....we don't want to get involved in the conflict between Syria/Assad Regime and the band of merry rebels fighting them (Al Qaeda) for control. We simply want to lob a few missiles over the fence and destroy some of the Assad Regime's key resources, as punishment for the chemical weapons use. It's our job to punish them.

It's not like that would get us involved in toppling the regime, help the rebels (Al Qaeda) in their mission, etc, etc.

Essentially, we want to get "half-pregnant."

It's a great plan, just trust our omnipotent President's decision (if he ever makes one) blindly and you'll be fine.

-----

In my opinion, the Brits got it right. Call the dogs, piss on the fire, and take it to the house. I'm tired of us spending American money (borrowed from China) and more importantly American LIVES over there in that hell hole of a Middle East trying to polish a turd into a turkey sandwich.

If we went to war with every country in the Middle East that was unstable and chocked full of terrorist groups that would love to kill Americans....well....we would pretty much have to nuke the whole place.

[Hlleonard]

North Korea saber rattles.
Mexico. I don't understand your point.
Darfur....no strategic reason. Yea, from a humanitarian point we should have intervened.

Syria.......they have chemical weapons, and are in bed with groups that WANT to destroy America. WTF do you not understand about that.......Again, North Korea rattles all the time, but Radical Muslims strap on bombs and KILL people, or jump on planes with box cutters and KILL people......but I guess that is completely OK with you.

WE sure the hell forget quickly, don't we.

If it was up to me, I'd turn the entire region to GLASS.......

Later,

Geo

--
Hmmm... you think we should conduct military operations for "humanitarian reasons" yet you think we should " turn the entire region to GLASS", Mr. Fisher you are one screwed up dude.

[Hlleonard]

No, no, no....we don't want to get involved in the conflict between Syria/Assad Regime and the band of merry rebels fighting them (Al Qaeda) for control. We simply want to lob a few missiles over the fence and destroy some of the Assad Regime's key resources, as punishment for the chemical weapons use. It's our job to punish them.

It's not like that would get us involved in toppling the regime, help the rebels (Al Qaeda) in their mission, etc, etc.

Essentially, we want to get "half-pregnant."

It's a great plan, just trust our omnipotent President's decision (if he ever makes one) blindly and you'll be fine.

-----

In my opinion, the Brits got it right. Call the dogs, piss on the fire, and take it to the house. I'm tired of us spending American money (borrowed from China) and more importantly American LIVES over there in that hell hole of a Middle East trying to polish a turd into a turkey sandwich.

If we went to war with every country in the Middle East that was unstable and chocked full of terrorist groups that would love to kill Americans....well....we would pretty much have to nuke the whole place.

--
Like

[GeoFisher]

A very small........SMALL......let me say it again SMALL number of fighters in Syria are RADICAL Islamic crazy dudes supporting Al-Qaeda.

Here is a breakdown. Surely you folks are smart enough to use google yourself.

* 50,000 - Free Syrian Army. Non sectarian. (Christian and Kurds) mostly.
* 37,000 - Syrian Liberation Front. Islamic Nationalists.....but not RADICALIZED Al-Qaeda. THEY HATE THEM.
* 13,000 - Syrian Islamic Front. Islamic Nationalists......pretty much the same as above.

All those are non radicalized. They want democracy and want a FREE Syria.

Now for the RADICALS.

* 5,000 and growing - Jabhat al-Nusra. They are Al-Qaeda backed.

Understand this is less than 5% of the total fighters, and even less of a percentage of the population of Syria.

You guys need to UNDERSTAND that even in IRAN there are good people that HATE the Radical Islamic Factions as much as we do. We should support them as much as possible, or we will be fighting THEM TOO in the future.

Obama looks like a **** fool for getting painted in a corner with is silly ass red line comments.

"Don't cross this red line........wait, don't cross this red line..........hold on don't cross this red line...........no REALLY, you better not cross this final red line.......**** IT you dirty sob's.........how about you DRAW the red line you're not going to cross".

Bomb the living **** out of them, and be done with it. While your at it. BOMB the Radical Islamic camps that are housing those 5000 crazy ******** that are supported by Al-Qaeda. I'm sure the Syrian Free Army won't mind.


Later,

Geo

[DJD]

If we went to war with every country in the Middle East that was unstable and chocked full of terrorist groups that would love to kill Americans....well....we would pretty much have to nuke the whole place.

I bet we could make some nice Golf courses over there with all that oil money!