Climate experts asked to OMIT data

[url]http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/nation-and-world/climate-report-struggles-temperature-quirks[/url]

I'm not worried..........the Climate Alarmists will figure some way to justify their LIES.

[I][B]Germany called for the reference to the slowdown to be deleted, saying a time span of 10 to 15 years was misleading in the context of climate change, which is measured over decades and centuries.[/B][/I]

Actually if we're talking about 2 centuries we're talking about 5 - 7.5% of the data........but we're really talking about 100 years, which means 10-15% of the collected data is skewed.........HM.

Maybe they will get a few more BILLION dollars over the next 10 years to study the study.

Anyone ever wonder where it ends?

Later,

Geo

Of course it will be omitted or forgotten...the best way to make it go away? The Climate Change scientists, political figures, gubment money recipients and others will just inundate everyone with volumes of data that try and show their point of view and after years of that most people will forget and money will continue to flow to the people who want more gubment control and things will be just like it has been.

I heard on NPR yesterday how a caller said that the Hurricane Sandy storm was so devastating because the ocean is more full from global warming and the melting ice caps and that created major flooding and a bigger storm surge. Anyone else hear of this theory? Naturally, she was a Carbon tax proponent so I figured she was manipulating the story to suit her agenda.

[QUOTE=GeoFisher;521560][URL]http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/nation-and-world/climate-report-struggles-temperature-quirks[/URL]

I'm not worried..........the Climate Alarmists will figure some way to justify their LIES.

[I][B]Germany called for the reference to the slowdown to be deleted, saying a time span of 10 to 15 years was misleading in the context of climate change, which is measured over decades and centuries.[/B][/I]

Actually if we're talking about 2 centuries we're talking about 5 - 7.5% of the data........but we're really talking about 100 years, which means 10-15% of the collected data is skewed.........HM.

Maybe they will get a few more BILLION dollars over the next 10 years to study the study.

Anyone ever wonder where it ends?

Later,

Geo[/QUOTE] [URL]http://www.nbcnews.com/science/still-standing-ancient-alaskan-forest-thaws-melting-glacial-tomb-4B11215106[/URL]

[QUOTE=waterdog101;521577][URL]http://www.nbcnews.com/science/still-standing-ancient-alaskan-forest-thaws-melting-glacial-tomb-4B11215106[/URL][/QUOTE]

I don't deny that warming exists............

I contend that we have NOTHING to do with it, or very, very little.

warming trends and cycles have been occurring for tens of THOUSANDS of years, not a few decades.

We use assumptive data from a few hundred years to justify spending TRILLIONS worldwide for a problem we really don't even understand.

Later,

Geo