Tree huggers protect old growth forest don't they?
[QUOTE=mhall;524025]We are now recieving plans to bid on for major projects that have specs requiring ''Old Growth Timber Only''. We have seen these ever so often over the last few years but are now becoming almost common place. Usually these also require a moisture content of 7 to 9% in all lumber used........really......No....really, lol.
Here is why this is SOOOOOOOOOOO Stupid.
1. When the Trusses or Wall panels yada yada do show up, whom will be the braniac to determine if it is said Old growth Timber. Is their a way to tell...Yes but most people don't know how and it's certainly not an exact science by any stretch.
2. No Mills that are currently supplying basic framing materials are strickly cutting Old Growth. Can it be purchased...Yes but it's higher than Michelle Obama's dentist bill and VERY hard to get. Also there is really no way to Vet it once it shows up.
3. Moisture content 7 to 9%, LOL....Well first off that is WAAAAY to low for building materials. Your house at home on interior members have barely dried to that amount and only if you have a very arrid climate in your house. Building with materials that dry half will break during construction and half later....really BAD IDEA. Why do they spec this, because of the Mold hysteria that is running rampid. Mold will not grow on building materials until it reaches a mositure level of 20% and higher and must sustain that for several days to at times weeks. Most all lumber is Kiln dried to 19%. They do this because that is the optimal number to use and then let dry later to achieve a desired level of MC.
This country is going to Hell and run by morons. This naturalist tree hugging crap is going full on NUTS. Pretty soon Barry will sign a bill and we will all be pulling boats with Clysdale's or Prius. No wait the Clysdale's make Methane gas... so thats definately out to..............What a joke!!!![/QUOTE]
I not following you. It's my understanding that the tree huggers don't want the old growth forests cut down. So why would a tree hugger promote cutting down and using old growth forest for building materials?
I'd venture to say that people who favor cutting down the old growth forest trees are in it for the money and could care less about the forest other than they they want to use it to make money. The smart money people want to sustain the old growth forest for later use. So the do selective cutting forestry instead of clear cutting. It cost more but it preserves some of the three for later use and helps maintain the forest.
I've read that 200 years ago a gray squirrel could move across the Eastern USA from the East Coast to the Mississippi River without touching the ground as there were so many trees covering the Eastern Part of the USA back then.
We have more people now and less forests.
I guess one could ID the type of wood by looking at the wood under a microscope and checking out the cell structures. I know at the school I went to they teach courses in Dendrology and teach the students how to identify different types of trees by the bark so that they can ID deciduous trees in the winter months when they don't have any leaves on the trees.
These days most of the trees that are grown for lumber are faster growing species like pines. White Pine forests are grown for timber as they grow much faster than an Oak tree or a Hickory tree.
If you find a old mature walnut tree save it as it's probably valuable for it's lumber.