Benghazi scandal not a scandal after all?

Who would of thought it?


[url]http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2014/08/04/new-report-wont-stand-down-benghazi-conspiracy-theories/[/url]


"In short, all of the things that were alleged to have happened didn’t happen. Ruppersberger called the report “a bipartisan, factual, definitive report on what the Intelligence Community did and did not do.” And here’s the kicker: It was “adopted unanimously and sent to the Intelligence Community for a declassification review.” Unanimously, by a committee made up of 12 Republicans and nine Democrats."

Then Fox News has not been telling us the truth about Hillary Clinton all along. That does not surprise me one bit. They get it wrong all the time. Nothing surprised me when it comes to that guy over in Britain who owns Fox News. R. Murdock is a JOKE! A bad one at that!

[QUOTE=pontooner;536556]Who would of thought it?


[url]http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2014/08/04/new-report-wont-stand-down-benghazi-conspiracy-theories/[/url]


"In short, all of the things that were alleged to have happened didn’t happen. Ruppersberger called the report “a bipartisan, factual, definitive report on what the Intelligence Community did and did not do.” And here’s the kicker: It was “adopted unanimously and sent to the Intelligence Community for a declassification review.” Unanimously, by a committee made up of 12 Republicans and nine Democrats."[/QUOTE]

there you go again, mixing up facts and news.Facts are boring, news makes your blood boil.

From what I remember, while the attack was happening there was a call made to inform our government that they were under attack. No mention of a "spontaneous protest because of a video". It was our intelligence agencies that made that change(for what reason we may never know) and the BO administration ran with it. It fit their narrative that B L is dead and GM is alive. No terrorism under his watch. I don't understand how we can have a CIA annex there and not provide some kind of help close by for those people if they do run into problems. That's not how our military does things. It's like they were hung out to dry so to speak. Was it to make it look like there were no problems over there anymore? At the very least, BO is hoping that claiming incompetence will be enough to keep him in power. You know, because he learns about these things the same way you do, from the T.V. He's probably right because we don't hold our officials to a high standard since Bill Clinton. I wish we could go back to a time when we held our elected officials responsible. Matter of fact, I think some of those associated with this mess got promotions. I like the fact that we drove Nixon out of office not only for what he did, but for what he wanted to do(use the IRS to go after his enemies, That would never happen today though :rolleyes: ) It was a republican who asked the question, "what did he know and when did he know it". The very fact that the Dems stood on the steps of Congress in support of Bill Clinton made it almost impossible for any President to ever be held responsible for anything they do. Whether it be un-Constitutional or just plain incompetence. We deserve the Government we have because we aren't willing to do the hard thing anymore. Oh and Trey Gowdy is the Dems worst nightmare. He is one prosecutor that is sharp as a tack.

Hmmmmm wonder why all the smoke screens from the administration then?? Is it just common practice for this admin to assist in wasting years of money and time?? Why not just come clean with everything up front and expose all emails, voice mails, letters, notes and whatever to stop any suspicion???

It was a defensive reaction, like a possum playing dead, a hedge hog rolling into a ball, things like that are natural. Why defensive? because what ever the guy does, a lot of folks call it wrong. That happens to public figures after a few years. All of them.

[QUOTE=DJD;536574]Hmmmmm wonder why all the smoke screens from the administration then?? Is it just common practice for this admin to assist in wasting years of money and time?? Why not just come clean with everything up front and expose all emails, voice mails, letters, notes and whatever to stop any suspicion???[/QUOTE]


Not sure if you're serious about who is to blame for "wasting years of money and time" on this.

You seem to be a fairly smart guy so I'm going to assume you're just trying to troll me.

[QUOTE=pontooner;536556]Who would of thought it?


[url]http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2014/08/04/new-report-wont-stand-down-benghazi-conspiracy-theories/[/url]


"In short, all of the things that were alleged to have happened didn’t happen. Ruppersberger called the report “a bipartisan, factual, definitive report on what the Intelligence Community did and did not do.” And here’s the kicker: It was “adopted unanimously and sent to the Intelligence Community for a declassification review.” Unanimously, by a committee made up of 12 Republicans and nine Democrats."[/QUOTE]

Spare me. A vaguely worded column written by a derisive left winger. Really? The column has no specifics or excerpts from the report and reaches the general assertion the Obama administration was justified in sending Susan Rice out to lie to the media.

He also mentions there was no stand down order issued to those who could have helped the embassy people. Well, was there a damned 'stand up' order issued? Something along the lines of 'get in there and help those people'?

Another generality from this clown is the intelligence people warned them, but had no specific tactical information. You realize how stupid that sounds? A warning is a warning. Is anyone supposed to believe the specific tactics of radical Muslim nut jobs should have been provided?

This column is a load of shixt genned up by another Democrat media attack dog helping the most transparent administration in history cover their incompetence.

[QUOTE=kygorski;536584]It was a defensive reaction, like a possum playing dead, a hedge hog rolling into a ball, things like that are natural. Why defensive? because what ever the guy does, a lot of folks call it wrong. That happens to public figures after a few years. All of them.[/QUOTE]

Possum. Hedge hog.

Right. Okay I get it.

Kind of like conveniently 'losing' email for certain people during a certain period of time at the IRS.

Defensive. Yeah that's it, defensive.

Jim..DH is all over this...The Washington Post what a liberal based rag. Only use for that paper or its writing is to let your Dog S h i t on it. They are as left as you can get and trying to cover OVomit and Killery's tracks. You Libs make me laugh, really laugh.


If it looks like poop, smells like poop, feels like poop......its usually frickin poop!

[QUOTE=Mean Morone;536567]From what I remember, while the attack was happening there was a call made to inform our government that they were under attack. No mention of a "spontaneous protest because of a video". It was our intelligence agencies that made that change(for what reason we may never know) and the BO administration ran with it. It fit their narrative that B L is dead and GM is alive. No terrorism under his watch. I don't understand how we can have a CIA annex there and not provide some kind of help close by for those people if they do run into problems. That's not how our military does things. It's like they were hung out to dry so to speak. Was it to make it look like there were no problems over there anymore? At the very least, BO is hoping that claiming incompetence will be enough to keep him in power. You know, because he learns about these things the same way you do, from the T.V. He's probably right because we don't hold our officials to a high standard since Bill Clinton. I wish we could go back to a time when we held our elected officials responsible. Matter of fact, I think some of those associated with this mess got promotions. I like the fact that we drove Nixon out of office not only for what he did, but for what he wanted to do(use the IRS to go after his enemies, That would never happen today though :rolleyes: ) It was a republican who asked the question, "what did he know and when did he know it". The very fact that the Dems stood on the steps of Congress in support of Bill Clinton made it almost impossible for any President to ever be held responsible for anything they do. Whether it be un-Constitutional or just plain incompetence. We deserve the Government we have because we aren't willing to do the hard thing anymore. Oh and Trey Gowdy is the Dems worst nightmare. He is one prosecutor that is sharp as a tack.[/QUOTE]

[url]http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/05/10/benghazi-emails/2150103/[/url]