Printable View
when I voted, I never got my gift. so from what Romney said in this statement, goes hand in hand with his 47% statement. he must really be Bitter.[url]http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/elections-fastbreak/2012/nov/16/mitt-romney-obama-won-giving-voters-gifts-governme/[/url]
[QUOTE=waterdog101;502409]when I voted, I never got my gift. so from what Romney said in this statement, goes hand in hand with his 47% statement. he must really be Bitter.[url]http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/elections-fastbreak/2012/nov/16/mitt-romney-obama-won-giving-voters-gifts-governme/[/url][/QUOTE]
HM......
Dream Act.......giveaway to Latinos
GM..........giveaway to UNIONS
BirthControl.......giveaway to young women
ObamaCare.......giveaway to everyone else.
"No republic has long outlived the discovery by a majority of its people that they could vote themselves largesse from the public treasury."
--Alexander Tytler
[QUOTE=GeoFisher;502415]HM......
Dream Act.......giveaway to Latinos
GM..........giveaway to UNIONS
BirthControl.......giveaway to young women
ObamaCare.......giveaway to everyone else.
"No republic has long outlived the discovery by a majority of its people that they could vote themselves largesse from the public treasury."
--Alexander Tytler[/QUOTE]
Birth control-young women???
Not young couples??? Couples with two children and are not ready to give up sex????
Talk about givaways. G. W. Bush signed the TARP act....not B. Obama..$700,000,000,000.00. Sent to Wall Street.
But hey prior to that there was the FIRREA program that gave $50,000,000,000.00 to bail out the failed savings and loan industry in 1980s money. Singed by G.H. Bush. Then there was the Keating 5 with John McCain front and center.
So if G.W. abd G.H. Bush gave bankers over $750,000,000,000.00 why in the heck did'nt they vote for Mitt the guy they endorsed????
No giveaways there.
I searched my truck, drove to the shuttered polling place and looked aroung the discards, to no avail.What was it supposed to be anyway?
Anyone who denies he didn't pander to his homeys is a fool. Sure no one received a wrapped present but when you do the things he did toward his groupies it was all about buying their votes. I could care less if he did it because they all do it but to sit back and act as if he didnt do that means you have a bad case of CRANIUS RECTEMUS.
The article is about as full of bull as Obama. Geez people get paid for that garbage??? It reads like one of you Libs wrote it. :)
[QUOTE=DJD;502447]Anyone who denies he didn't pander to his homeys is a fool. Sure no one received a wrapped present but when you do the things he did toward his groupies it was all about buying their votes. I could care less if he did it because they all do it but to sit back and act as if he didnt do that means you have a bad case of CRANIUS RECTEMUS.
The article is about as full of bull as Obama. Geez people get paid for that garbage??? It reads like one of you Libs wrote it. :)[/QUOTE]
You know.......I'm about as tired as I can be arguing with total MORONIC FOOLS..........
Have your hope and change. Don't COME to me when you wonder WTF went wrong..
Obamunism is what went wrong.
[QUOTE=GeoFisher;502449]You know.......I'm about as tired as I can be arguing with total MORONIC FOOLS..........
Have your hope and change. Don't COME to me when you wonder WTF went wrong..
Obamunism is what went wrong.[/QUOTE] easy now Geo, man you sound like your about to explode. life's to short to get worked up so. " Moronic Fools " now that's pretty heavy. 62 million voted for the guy.
[QUOTE=GeoFisher;502449]You know.......I'm about as tired as I can be arguing with total MORONIC FOOLS..........
Have your hope and change. Don't COME to me when you wonder WTF went wrong..
Obamunism is what went wrong.[/QUOTE]
Yea.... family of 4 with income from Wall Mart of $24,000.00 year gets $80.00 month food stamps is government handouts. $750,000,000,000.00 to banks and savings and loans is just business.
So it's time we deregulate banking as much as possible because they have gone through the Tarp funds and we can bail them out again in 10 years.
So we can't learn from history (we can't blame Bush). So I will not come to you with any problem from Obamas presidency, but you quit complaining about the economy that Bush took to the edge of complete failure. Yes the 8 years of Bush policy peeked in 2009 with the failure of the banking industry.
So quit complaining about the economy because you supported Bush. I won't complain about Obama.
Fair is fair.
[QUOTE=kydonky;502475]Yea.... family of 4 with income from Wall Mart of $24,000.00 year gets $80.00 month food stamps is government handouts. $750,000,000,000.00 to banks and savings and loans is just business.
So it's time we deregulate banking as much as possible because they have gone through the Tarp funds and we can bail them out again in 10 years.
So we can't learn from history (we can't blame Bush). So I will not come to you with any problem from Obamas presidency, but you quit complaining about the economy that Bush took to the edge of complete failure. Yes the 8 years of Bush policy peeked in 2009 with the failure of the banking industry.
So quit complaining about the economy because you supported Bush. I won't complain about Obama.
Fair is fair.[/QUOTE]
You guys have been blaming Bush forever..I will give you the 4 trillion in wars.....I will give you the 850 billion for Medicare Part D.
I WILL NOT give you the banking failures....those were not caused by Bush....STOP trying to blame him.....revisionism.
Very simplisticly, the banking failures were caused by bad loans given to folks who could not afford them. Those bad loans where then bundled into securities with very little value and pumped on the market as a "good bet".
Bush DIDN'T cause that.......so stop freaking blaming him......Learn something.
While you're learning......REALIZE Obama has spent 2x as much as Bush in 1/2 the time.....or does that even matter??
Later,
Geo
[QUOTE=waterdog101;502467]Moronic Fools " now that's pretty heavy. 62 million voted for the guy.[/QUOTE]
The righteous path is the path less travelled.
[QUOTE=GeoFisher;502486]You guys have been blaming Bush forever..I will give you the 4 trillion in wars.....I will give you the 850 billion for Medicare Part D.
I WILL NOT give you the banking failures....those were not caused by Bush....STOP trying to blame him.....revisionism.
Very simplisticly, the banking failures were caused by bad loans given to folks who could not afford them. Those bad loans where then bundled into securities with very little value and pumped on the market as a "good bet".
Bush DIDN'T cause that.......so stop freaking blaming him......Learn something.
While you're learning......REALIZE Obama has spent 2x as much as Bush in 1/2 the time.....or does that even matter??
Later,
Geo[/QUOTE]
I agree the trillions on wars have taken a toll. Some we could not avoid (Afganistan) one we may have avoided (Iraq) but more than likely we would have had to deal with anyway over time. So The Iraq war probably would have had to have been fought one time or another.
This brings us to the point I want to make. We have fought two wars at a cost of trillions of $$$$. Yet none in this country want to make any sacrafice or endure the slightest inconvienence to fight these wars or help the good ole USA.
In WWII just about everything was rationed from gas to shoes, bread, beef, etc. Factories were converted for war production. Today we want to win the war on terror and keep our country safe as long as we get a tax break doing it, as long as it does not cause an incovienece.
Corporate money in politics is there to promote the "world economy". Pushing US jobs offshore. They could care less if they are based in Denver or Bali as long as they maximize profits. The Bad part is that they use the US infastucture and enjoy our security as much or more than anyone yet they don't want to contribute. If you or I get robbed $500.00 the local police file a report that gets burried, if a bank gets robbed the FBI comes in and catches the robber and sends hime to prison. Bank robbery is federal offense no matter how much $ is involved. The FBI solves bank robery of a rate around 98%.
So Just saying there is coporate welfare and there is social welfare. Abuse of either needs to stop.
So the comment that "birth control was a gift to young women" from Obama for their vote is just one sided. Birth control only benifits "young women"??? What about the other half of that equation..takes two you know.
[QUOTE=kydonky;502502]I agree the trillions on wars have taken a toll. Some we could not avoid (Afganistan) one we may have avoided (Iraq) but more than likely we would have had to deal with anyway over time. So The Iraq war probably would have had to have been fought one time or another.
This brings us to the point I want to make. We have fought two wars at a cost of trillions of $$$$. Yet none in this country want to make any sacrafice or endure the slightest inconvienence to fight these wars or help the good ole USA.
In WWII just about everything was rationed from gas to shoes, bread, beef, etc. Factories were converted for war production. Today we want to win the war on terror and keep our country safe as long as we get a tax break doing it, as long as it does not cause an incovienece.
Corporate money in politics is there to promote the "world economy". Pushing US jobs offshore. They could care less if they are based in Denver or Bali as long as they maximize profits. The Bad part is that they use the US infastucture and enjoy our security as much or more than anyone yet they don't want to contribute. If you or I get robbed $500.00 the local police file a report that gets burried, if a bank gets robbed the FBI comes in and catches the robber and sends hime to prison. Bank robbery is federal offense no matter how much $ is involved. The FBI solves bank robery of a rate around 98%.
So Just saying there is coporate welfare and there is social welfare. Abuse of either needs to stop.
So the comment that "birth control was a gift to young women" from Obama for their vote is just one sided. Birth control only benifits "young women"??? What about the other half of that equation..takes two you know.[/QUOTE]
Real quick.....the birth control issue.
Did you see a single young man bitching about free birth control......NOPE. While it effects both the man and the woman, only WOMEN see it as a womans right, and would change their vote based on it.....of course, that is my assumption.
If you don't see this as an issue that DIRECTLY related to how Obama effectively target women and won that particular vote, you are missing a whole lot of the picture.
Same as abortion. I think abortion is the most vile, disgusting thing a woman can do, but IT IS HER CHOICE, plain and simple....her body. I really don't see too many guys in that same demographic too concerned about if a woman can or cannot get an abortion.......They may care, but it didn't SWAY their vote like young, democratic women.....again an assumption.
Later,
Geo