Printable View
[url=http://rt.com/news/rockets-russian-plane-syria-575/]Missiles fired at Russian plane with 200 passengers onboard flying over Syria ? reports ? RT News[/url]
NO idea who fired the rockets, but man oh man.........
It is about to get ugly there.
Later,
Geo
It's about to get ugly because of the chemical weapons being used, not because of this bogus report.
[QUOTE=RoadToad;513519]It's about to get ugly because of the chemical weapons being used, not because of this bogus report.[/QUOTE]
Right...........The RUSSIANS see that Obama is not doing anything about the chemical weapons so they are creating fake attacks on russian airlines, to "justify" taking action.
It really chaps my can that Obama who said using chemical weapons is "crossing a line" simply doesn't believe the reports about DEAD Syrians from sarin gas.
More scary is WHO used them............
MORE MORE scary are the assumed plans to deal with the weapons. Destroying them via air strikes or cruise missiles may not be adequate, meaning troops on the ground. Hopefully NOT ours.
AND I agree.....the news report is bogus......when it first started breaking it was only a report and didn't have the detail......I too thought that an airbus outmaneuvering a SAM seemed unlikely, but if the SAM was fired blind, I could definitely see it.
Later,
Geo
No way that an Airbus outmaneuvers a SAM...I don't care if Pete "Maverick" Mitchell is on the controls...
As long as there are more than one, let em go at each other. With our great success in Iraq, and how well were doing in afganistan, and picking the losers to back in libiya. weve done enough already.
as
[QUOTE=kygorski;513529]As long as there are more than one, let em go at each other. With our great success in Iraq, and how well were doing in afganistan, and picking the losers to back in libiya. weve done enough already.
as[/QUOTE]
And I say this with the utmost of sincerity..."Piss on Syria."
I really could care less. Sorry.
But, we're going to double the amount of our non-lethal aid to the rebels...great. We had no need for that cash here anyway.
Yep say good bye to millions of dollars and resources to overthrow the gubment there. Will we borrow money for this from China???
[QUOTE=MrSplitshot;513532]And I say this with the utmost of sincerity..."Piss on Syria."
I really could care less. Sorry.
But, we're going to double the amount of our non-lethal aid to the rebels...great. We had no need for that cash here anyway.[/QUOTE]
I don't give two SHITS about Syria.........I care VERY MUCH about the chemical and biological weapons that are stored there. I'd sure like to get the stuff we gave Saddam back :) :)
In reality, the weapons there can and will be used against Americans in the future, therefore is it in our NATIONAL SECURITY interests, to take care of business, and SECURE that ****.
Imagine a Sarin gas attack in a subway in New York.......they could very easily kill thousands of people with a backpack.
How hard was it to put a backpack bomb in Boston......not very hard at all.......
THAT is what is scary, and therefore critical to our national security.
Later,
Geo
[QUOTE=GeoFisher;513543]I don't give two SHITS about Syria.........I care VERY MUCH about the chemical and biological weapons that are stored there. I'd sure like to get the stuff we gave Saddam back :) :)
In reality, the weapons there can and will be used against Americans in the future, therefore is it in our NATIONAL SECURITY interests, to take care of business, and SECURE that ****.
Imagine a Sarin gas attack in a subway in New York.......they could very easily kill thousands of people with a backpack.
How hard was it to put a backpack bomb in Boston......not very hard at all.......
THAT is what is scary, and therefore critical to our national security.
Later,
Geo[/QUOTE]
OK, that's fair...but we're going to "secure them" by opening a cash pipeline to a bunch of Syrian rebels? Why am I not comforted by that?
That crap would be on Craigslist in a week.