Lake Cumberland or Loch Ness ?

A rainy Saturday night, its dark, and we're headed toward Jamestown at a slow crawl. Searchlight is scanning and the bow lights are lit. We've seen debris all day. It's eerie....there's a light fog forming.....the water is silk smooth with no breeze to move the wisps of sea steam as they rise. The spotlight first, then the bow light silhouette's a shape in the misty fog. We drop the boat motor to neutral and approach inquisitively......are we still moving......or is it? What is that? Are we still in Kentucky?

That is clearly the remnants of a Viking ship that landed in central KY years ago.........

"log-mess monster"

[QUOTE=HURRICANEBOB;513941]"log-mess monster"[/QUOTE]

Good one. You better get a patent on that. I see it being used a lot in the future.

There actual entire Forest's floating right now. I know evverybody is all giddy about the water coming up, but personally I am not and have never been a fan of 725 summer pool. There is NO bank at that level. I wish they would go to 710 and leave it there, that would be my vote...

All the old ledges we got lot & lots of Smallmouth will be back under water & I can't wait personally. What do you mean there is no bank ??? There are some very good banks that will be great again with waqter on them.

Tis' Nessie! Let me run get me pipes! :D

[QUOTE=Les Young;514002]All the old ledges we got lot & lots of Smallmouth will be back under water & I can't wait personally. What do you mean there is no bank ??? There are some very good banks that will be great again with waqter on them.[/QUOTE]

Just a fan of the lake being a little lower. Never been a fan of 723 or 725. 710 would be perfect and still accomplish what you and I are after.....:)