Re: Missouri trying to take advantage of Cumberland situation
[QUOTE=fishincreek;293009]What wasn't true?[/QUOTE]
"This will be a great relief to the Lake Cumberland sportsmen who were warned by Kentucky Commerce Secretary George Ward that as many as 90 percent of Lake Cumberland launching ramps will be unusable," he said they may be unusuable, but that many ramps could be extended, not that they would be unusuable.
"while Corps engineers are predicting fish kills because of a rise in water temperature." Nobody to my knowledge ever predicted a fish kill, they predicted if we got an unusually wet spring, water tepmeratures "could rise" and bring on a fish kill."
"Unlike Lake Cumberland, we have an abundance of water at our Ozark Twin Lakes," Kelly Linck, Executive Director of the Ozark Mountain Region tourism association.Even at 680 feet, there is still plenty of water.
Sounds a lot like what a guy from Blood River on KY Lake was trying to tell people back at the Jim Strader show. Another person without the facts. Of course this guy owned a resort on KY Lake and had never heard of Dave Stewart, so I realized he wasn't knowledgeable.
Re: Missouri trying to take advantage of Cumberland situation
Ramps are at a premium and are making an impact to fishing. The Dept HAS made mention they are concerned of a fish die-off of larger stripers. I heard them with my own two ears. As for the "abundance of water, speak to those local residents that now have dry wells.
Re: Missouri trying to take advantage of Cumberland situation
KDFWR has made mention of the possibility of a fish die off, but they certainly aren't predicting it. There are way to many factors that could influence that.
As for the abundance of water, I didn't say that..... the people from the Ozarks said they have an abundance of water. At 680 there is still more water than other lakes around the state.
my main point is they are trying to use scare tactics and spread misinformation to try and take advantage to bring more income to their area.
Re: Missouri trying to take advantage of Cumberland situation
[quote=geobass;292984]Come on guys! Don't send them this way. Lets send them down to Tenn![/quote]
Don't need them down our way either if they are in anything bigger than a fishing rig... LOL. :p Seriously, I have already seen alot more boats and several BIG boats on dale this year than it seems normal for this time of year and the warm weather is just about to get started. I think alot of people will drive a few more miles down the road this year for sure to the hollow.
Re: Missouri trying to take advantage of Cumberland situation
The big party boats won't like Dale as well as Cumberland. Tennessee enforces their laws on the water a little more serious then in KY. I don't think you will find a 76 falls area on Dale due to the fact that (IMHO) TN won't put up with that. With that said that is not a slap in the face to our fine fish and game officers. They are way way undermanned to take something on like this.
I am just worried about local businesses missing out on the money from gas, hotels, restaurants etc from not having the OH army coming down every weekend. As a fisherman I love the fact that the lake will be less crowed with big party boats.
Re: Missouri trying to take advantage of Cumberland situation
And my main point is they are a little closer to the truth than some want to admit.
Re: Missouri trying to take advantage of Cumberland situation
Matt, I think what you said and what I am saying are the same thing. Stories are GENERATED by press releases, but are not published as is. They are rewritten by a reporter who has the responsibility to check facts before they go to print.
Another difference between a press release and an advertisement is money. You stated you paid a PR firm to get the press releases out to the media, but did you buy advertising space from the newspaper or were the articles written as a feature?
As an example, if the press release above was published in a newspaper and nobody checked the facts in the press release, the company putting out the press release would not be in trouble, but the newspaper has the responsibilty to call the appropriate people in KY to verify that the facts are correct (which in this case they were not).
I currently am a freelance outdoor writer with credits in major national magazines, as well as smaller markets, but I have worked for major market newspapers including a few years in the sports department at the Louisville Courier-Journal. I never witnessed or even heard about anybody printing a press release as is, unless it was paid for as an advertisement which leaves the newspaper off the hook for false claims.
I think we actually agree on this, but we are having a hard time communicating through are words on the computer.
I do know we agree on the main point of why I started this thread, there was too much false information in the press release.
Re: Missouri trying to take advantage of Cumberland situation
[QUOTE=Tim_T;293127]Matt, I think what you said and what I am saying are the same thing. Stories are GENERATED by press releases, but are not published as is. They are rewritten by a reporter who has the responsibility to check facts before they go to print.
Another difference between a press release and an advertisement is money. You stated you paid a PR firm to get the press releases out to the media, but did you buy advertising space from the newspaper or were the articles written as a feature?
As an example, if the press release above was published in a newspaper and nobody checked the facts in the press release, the company putting out the press release would not be in trouble, but the newspaper has the responsibilty to call the appropriate people in KY to verify that the facts are correct (which in this case they were not).
I currently am a freelance outdoor writer with credits in major national magazines, as well as smaller markets, but I have worked for major market newspapers including a few years in the sports department at the Louisville Courier-Journal. I never witnessed or even heard about anybody printing a press release as is, unless it was paid for as an advertisement which leaves the newspaper off the hook for false claims.
I think we actually agree on this, but we are having a hard time communicating through are words on the computer.
I do know we agree on the main point of why I started this thread, there was too much false information in the press release.[/QUOTE]
If you are a writer.. You should know that the statement "we are having a hard time communicating through are words on the computer." Should have been "our" words, not "are" words.
I guess that is what spell check and grammer check are for! lol
Re: Missouri trying to take advantage of Cumberland situation
I agree with you, but what you missing is that this press release was released on their own website as a press release which is deceptive because most of the public will view a website like theirs to report like a newspaper, the truth. It just amazes me to see stuff like that.
But, our Cumberland store has been selling boats like wild fire so there must be some great things at Cumberland still
Matt