[QUOTE=Devils Horse;480675]Uh...That's a dude holding the fish.[/QUOTE]
wow thats sick ! why is a dude posing as a hot forrestry babe ?
what is this world coming to........
Printable View
[QUOTE=Devils Horse;480675]Uh...That's a dude holding the fish.[/QUOTE]
wow thats sick ! why is a dude posing as a hot forrestry babe ?
what is this world coming to........
[QUOTE=Fishin is life;480635]If that fish is 11, then I've caught a ton of 8's and 9's....I'm thinkin thats a solid 6 and maybe a little bigger[/QUOTE]
Oh I didn't say I was buying into double digits but it looks obviously bigger than 6.
Pics are hard to judge by.
[QUOTE=stripernut;480734]wow thats sick ! why is a dude posing as a hot forrestry babe ?
what is this world coming to........[/QUOTE]
True brother, the world is a sick place anymore.
My eyes ain't what they used to be, maybe that IS a pair of females in the pic. Then again maybe you been spending too much time out there on the water alone.
Look at the tail on that brown one...whoowee!
[QUOTE=mhall;480753]Oh I didn't say I was buying into double digits but it looks obviously bigger than 6.
Pics are hard to judge by.[/QUOTE]
Mark, that's me in the pic, cleverly disguised as a hot Forrestry Service babelet. I put it on the internet just to get an argument started on fishin.com.
Fish only weighed 3 lbs 7 oz, but I have a special lens on my cell phone camera. Makes the fish look like an 11+ and me look like a 10.
[QUOTE=Tim_T;480672]LOL okay, since the Forest Service owns the land the lake is on, I guess they could tell KDFWR to get the hell off the lake if they wanted to. Whaddya think?[/QUOTE]
Ummm no! But US Forestry does not conduct shocking either.
[QUOTE=Devils Horse;480757]Mark, that's me in the pic, cleverly disguised as a hot Forrestry Service babelet. I put it on the internet just to get an argument started on fishin.com.
Fish only weighed 3 lbs 7 oz, but I have a special lens on my cell phone camera. Makes the fish look like an 11+ and me look like a 10.[/QUOTE]
LMAO
[QUOTE=MagikSmallie;480762]Ummm no! But US Forestry does not conduct shocking either.[/QUOTE]
Then would you kindly explain to me what it is that the FISHERY BIOLOGIST that work for U.S. FOREST SERVICE do? I would suspect that a fishery biologist, working for the U.S. Forest Service, would probably conduct shocking surveys on waters on U.S. Forest Service land.
[url]http://www.fs.fed.us/fsjobs/pdf/fishbiologist.pdf[/url]
[QUOTE=MagikSmallie;480534]U.S. Forestry obviously doesn't oversee shocking of fish rather they oversee...wait for it....forests! So I would call her a guest of KDFWR.[/QUOTE]
LMAO I also found this oh wise one, here is a study done by fishery biologist with the U.S. Forest Service and they gathered the data by....WAIT FOR IT.......SHOCKING FISH! :eek: :rolleyes:
[URL]http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_other/rmrs_2004_peterson_j001.pdf[/URL]
The fish was never weighed nor was it measured. The fish and wildlife was doing a study on walleyes at Laurel Lake.
And the plot thickens...Is this really a smallmouth? Is it a dude or a gal? Who shocked it up KDFWR or U.S,forestery? Is Jim really a cross dresser? So many questions....A regular Water - gate ...LOL
Its 6+ but no more than 7. Look at the way shes holding it. Tail first out stretched arms. A small girl at that. Some of these replys are rediculous with the weights. Some of these people must have their wives and girlfriends really fooled on size.
[QUOTE=Tim_T;480992]LMAO I also found this oh wise one, here is a study done by fishery biologist with the U.S. Forest Service and they gathered the data by....WAIT FOR IT.......SHOCKING FISH! :eek: :rolleyes:
[URL]http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_other/rmrs_2004_peterson_j001.pdf[/URL][/QUOTE]
According to the article the study was conducted by "Georgia Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit" NOT the U.S. Forestry!! Says so right at the top of the article.