-
[QUOTE=DJD;526904]I guess your not able to understand opinions that differ from your own. Most including myself agree with taking care of what we have. The opinion differs on so called data from GW alarmists. Don't you get that?? I also think the simple fact of us being outdoorsmen means we have a deeper desire to have clean water and air we just don't see the need to keep tossing trillions at this with such a cavalier attitude. Conservation is a huge part of bass fishing, hunting and being outdoors. We have been on that track for years!!!
Your party leaders and alot of liberals think the only way to get results is to toss money at it. Your parties war on dealing with the poor is a good example of how they fix these terrible things. The dems own that war on poverty and they have all the data they need but how's that working for you??
If historical data and new age electronics was so awesome then why did that ship get stuck??? I also have a theory about New Orleans. If your gonna build a city below sea level and it gets flooded from a major hurricane on the coast why can't we place the majority of the blame of flooding on the Corp of engineers or whoever was responsible for that levee? I remember hearing it was a money issue for years and that was the reason that levees around Lake P. were not managed better so the weaker levees gave in. So blame the politicians who prolly decided to take money they could have used for maintaining the levee and funded some GW adventure. Instead to GW alarmist A direct hit from a major Hurricane means a hurricane was only that strong and did that damage due to GW?
Im not gonna just jump on that bandwagon without questioning why. Maybe you and the other liberals that voted for Obama should have used that tact?? You know ask questions....Instead you guys just jumped on his magic carpet ride and ate all he was feeding the country as fact and look where we are. You have a terrible track record of questioning information as a voter for Obama. Of course you use the tact of most liberals and that is if someone doesn't agree 100% with you and no questions asked they are not able to keep up with your intellect and superior powers of being right. Yeah right....hahahaha. Please refer to the links posted on this thread and tell me they help the case of GW. I guess they poured over all that data and formed their opinions based on that huh?? Hahahaha[/QUOTE]
Some very good points made in that post IMO.
One of the things I find most frustrating is the left's propensity to deem anyone who disagrees with them mean, bigoted, or intellectually inferior.
-
Does anyone remember an island tilting over and then capsizing from overpopulation??? Is New Orleans sinking because of overpopulation????? GW scientist claim that the ocean is going to rise and flood Miami because of the ice caps melting, how can that be doesn't ice displace as much water as the water when it melts???? Have you ever poured a big glass of ice water forgot it and found it later all the ice melted but the water did not run over the top of the glass. Maybe Miami is sinking from overpopulation. Maybe this guy is on to something.
-
Another thought maybe the Titanic did not hit an iceberg but every one ran to one side of the boat to look at an iceberg and it capsized.
-
[QUOTE=roadrunner;526908]Does anyone remember an island tilting over and then capsizing from overpopulation??? Is New Orleans sinking because of overpopulation????? GW scientist claim that the ocean is going to rise and flood Miami because of the ice caps melting, how can that be doesn't ice displace as much water as the water when it melts???? Have you ever poured a big glass of ice water forgot it and found it later all the ice melted but the water did not run over the top of the glass. Maybe Miami is sinking from overpopulation. Maybe this guy is on to something.[/QUOTE]
--
I'm pretty sure you are just making noise with most of this post but in case you aren't, rising water levels are caused by ice frozen on top of land.
