UK Foootball -National Championship

[QUOTE=elnutsmalljaws;466838]Are you giving up?? I don't care if UK is 3-9. I don't believe I was arguing that they would be better than 3-9. I believe the argument was that Louisville was not "Much Better" than UK the past 10 years. Based on the fact that you have given up with "talk to me after the season" you LOSE THE DEBATE!! Keep playing the weak non-conference schedule in the weaker football conference and someday you may be GIVEN a BCS bowl bid but as the other extremely smart poster (Coombro) noted, you have to EARN it in the SEC. Typical Louisville fan that I pointed out earlier, using Speculation and Might Happen to try and win a debate.[/QUOTE]

How many BCS bowls has UK won? 0.

[QUOTE=bplgocards;466840]How many BCS bowls has UK won? 0.[/QUOTE]

Is that 1 year the sole basis for your debate? The Big East had been around since 1979. In 32 years of the conferences existence, how many National Titles in football has the Big East won? I will give you a hint, Kentucky won the National Title in 1951, which is exactly 1 more than the current Big East conference TOTAL had won. I think Miami was a member of the Big East when they won their title. Current BCS format, SEC 7-0 in Championship game appearances. SEC has 15 BCS Bowl wins, most in history. Kentucky far and above play the tougher schedule in the TOUGHEST Conference.

[QUOTE=elnutsmalljaws;466841]Is that 1 year the sole basis for your debate? The Big East had been around since 1979. In 32 years of the conferences existence, how many National Titles in football has the Big East won? I will give you a hint, Kentucky won the National Title in 1951, which is exactly 1 more than the current Big East conference TOTAL had won. I think Miami was a member of the Big East when they won their title. Current BCS format, SEC 7-0 in Championship game appearances. SEC has 15 BCS Bowl wins, most in history. Kentucky far and above play the tougher schedule in the TOUGHEST Conference.[/QUOTE]

Too bad UK can't beat any SEC teams. Maybe you should apply to the MAC or Sun Belt.

[QUOTE=bplgocards;466842]Too bad UK can't beat any SEC teams. Maybe you should apply to the MAC or Sun Belt.[/QUOTE]

Too bad Louisville does not have the Stones to apply for the SEC. Your league is so stable with such a bright future that 2 of the founding members are jumping ship. The SEC is so strong that it is adding Texas A&M to the league next year. A&M dominates EVERY team in the Big East and won't even make the top 3 in the SEC

Speaking of the MAC, wasn't Marshall a member of the MAC in 2002 when they played a certain team from Louisville in a Bowl Game? How did that turn out for you? 38-15 The Thundering Herd!!!!

[QUOTE=elnutsmalljaws;466843]Too bad Louisville does not have the Stones to apply for the SEC. Your league is so stable with such a bright future that 2 of the founding members are jumping ship.

Speaking of the MAC, wasn't Marshall a member of the MAC in 2002 when they played a certain team from Louisville in a Bowl Game? How did that turn out for you? 38-15 The Thundering Herd!!!![/QUOTE]

smallnuts they had an nfl qb. i'll also remind you that miami oh did also. you are pathetic, have fun losing to team 25+ years in a row. also, the sec would beg louisville to join, except uk has in state veto. they don't want any competition in basketball, so it wont happen. have fun going 0 for whatever in the sec and losing to the likes of fl, ga, lsu, sc, tn and so on. see you when we are bowling at the end of the year and you are at home watching

[QUOTE=elnutsmalljaws;466843]Too bad Louisville does not have the Stones to apply for the SEC. Your league is so stable with such a bright future that 2 of the founding members are jumping ship. The SEC is so strong that it is adding Texas A&M to the league next year. A&M dominates EVERY team in the Big East and won't even make the top 3 in the SEC

Speaking of the MAC, wasn't Marshall a member of the MAC in 2002 when they played a certain team from Louisville in a Bowl Game? How did that turn out for you? 38-15 The Thundering Herd!!!![/QUOTE]

And the A&M comment was the most ignorant thing ive ever heard btw. They dominate every team in the big east? ok. And fyi syracuse and pitt founded the big east as a BASKETBALL conference.. get real.

[QUOTE=bplgocards;466845]And the A&M comment was the most ignorant thing ive ever heard btw. They dominate every team in the big east? ok. And fyi syracuse and pitt founded the big east as a BASKETBALL conference.. get real.[/QUOTE]

Which team in the Big East would beat A&M in football? Who says Louisville would be any competition to UK in Basketball? Last I checked was UK should fear Morehead State before it fears Louisville on the hardwood. As far as Syracuse and Pitt founding the Big East as a Basketball Conference, looks like it still is a Basketball Conference.

[QUOTE=bplgocards;466844]smallnuts they had an nfl qb. i'll also remind you that miami oh did also. you are pathetic, have fun losing to team 25+ years in a row. also, the sec would beg louisville to join, except uk has in state veto. they don't want any competition in basketball, so it wont happen. have fun going 0 for whatever in the sec and losing to the likes of fl, ga, lsu, sc, tn and so on. see you when we are bowling at the end of the year and you are at home watching[/QUOTE]

Sniffle Sniffle, that game don't count because they had a future NFL quarterback. Sniffle Sniffle, it ain't no fair because they had better players. Sniffle Sniffle, we were outplayed and outcoached. Sniffle Sniffle, here is a Kleenex blow your nose you big crybaby or as my wife would say "Whatever it takes"

Based on the fact that bplgocards feels that losses to teams with future NFL QB's don't count, the game between UK and UofL last Saturday never happened and does not count because Kentucky does not have a NFL QB on the roster

[QUOTE=elnutsmalljaws;466849]Sniffle Sniffle, that game don't count because they had a future NFL quarterback. Sniffle Sniffle, it ain't no fair because they had better players. Sniffle Sniffle, we were outplayed and outcoached. Sniffle Sniffle, here is a Kleenex blow your nose you big crybaby or as my wife would say "Whatever it takes"[/QUOTE]

Send me your address and I'll send you some Kleenex for your 3-9 season and for your basketball season that will most surely be ended by a BIG EAST team yet again.

[QUOTE=coombro;466833]hate to bust your bubble, but thy would not have put Louisville in the National Championship title game if you would have beat Rutgers. They would have over looked Louisville. Like Bobby Petrino said " They give you the bid iin the big east, you have to earn it in the SEC"[/QUOTE]

Not neccessarily true, Louisville had a huge margin advantage in the BCS rankings and ha they not lost to Rutgers they would have almost certainly played in the titl;e game over a two loss Florida team. The numbers game with the computers were stacked in Louisville's favor that year and it would have been very difficult for anyone to jump them if they hadn't choked away the game, they most likely would have been playing for the Mythical National Championship. Not saying they were the best team, just pointing this out.

Go Dale Jr...

Must be that river water that causes these Delusions.