Printable View
[url]http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/bassmaster/conservation/news/story?page=b_con_EthanolControversy_101014[/url]
The :mad:bama administration has approved production and sale of gasoline with up to 15 percent ethanol for 2007 and newer motor vehicles.
question is... will teh pumps be clearly marked?
[QUOTE=MagikSmallie;429477][url]http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/bassmaster/conservation/news/story?page=b_con_EthanolControversy_101014[/url]
The :mad:bama administration has approved production and sale of gasoline with up to 15 percent ethanol for 2007 and newer motor vehicles.[/QUOTE]
Another example of what Obama wants and not what the American people want.
[QUOTE=rustedhook;429536]Another example of what Obama wants and not what the American people want.[/QUOTE]
I am all most speechless. I can't remember the last time I even found a pump that didn't have E10. November is almost here folks, we can do something about this.
more ethanol means less money for the terrorist. either your with us or the terrorist a former president said. are you with us or the terrorist?
Ethanol burns hotter than gasoline and corrodes soft metals, plastics and rubber. The groups collectively believe more testing is needed to determine how much ethanol is too much for different types of existing engines to use safely without risking engine failure that could leave a boat stranded at sea, a snowmobile stuck in subfreezing temperatures in a wilderness blizzard, or a motorcycle unable to move in the blazing heat of a desert.
"Some ethanol companies want consumers to pump first and ask questions later," said National Petrochemical . I google the problems w/outboards like the above
Forget sending them to college get em in the outboard motor repair school. These outboards engines are doomed
[QUOTE=barkleyhawggitter;429682]more ethanol means less money for the terrorist. either your with us or the terrorist a former president said. are you with us or the terrorist?[/QUOTE]
NOT REALLY...........Most of our oil comes from Canada.
And More Ethanol REALLY means less corn for FEED, meaning More dollars for FOOD.........
Excellent, we get to pay subsidies for farmers to grow corn to make ethanol which is MORE EXPENSIVE than Gasoline.
We get to subsidize companies like US MOTORS (formerly GM), to build silly ass cars like the VOLT.
We get to pay MORE at the pump and MORE at the grocery.....because of Ethanol.
Excellent, eh.
Later,
Geo
BTW, you GREENIES, you do realize other developing countries (India and China) use quite a bit of energy, right?? Are they being forced onto Ethanol??
you DO REALIZE that they have NO EPA, right.
you DO REALIZE that even though they signed KYOTO, they will NEVER live up to it right??
Green Energy is a JOKE.........a simple JOKE.
Later,
Geo
[QUOTE=GeoFisher;429691]NOT REALLY...........Most of our oil comes from Canada.
And More Ethanol REALLY means less corn for FEED, meaning More dollars for FOOD.........
Excellent, we get to pay subsidies for farmers to grow corn to make ethanol which is MORE EXPENSIVE than Gasoline.
We get to subsidize companies like US MOTORS (formerly GM), to build silly ass cars like the VOLT.
We get to pay MORE at the pump and MORE at the grocery.....because of Ethanol.
Excellent, eh.
Later,
Geo[/QUOTE]
good luck getting either party in congress to get rid of farm welfare. welfare for farmers is here forever and dont buy the argument that they need it because they feed america, america is too fat.
Calm down guys, the E15 pumps have to be clearly marked, and they are only to be used in VEHICLES from 2006 and newer.
And as far as other countries not having an EPA, do you REALLY think that is a good thing? Come on people, don't you want a clean environment? i know they go overboard on things, but this land is ours, and we have to protect it.
[QUOTE=Rudypoo4444;429715]
And as far as other countries not having an EPA, do you REALLY think that is a good thing? Come on people, don't you want a clean environment? i know they go overboard on things, but this land is ours, and we have to protect it.[/QUOTE]
NO, I think it is a HORRIBLE thing, but the fact is......the GREENIES push Green this, and Green that, yet, the developing world will NEVER follow any of those Green rules. WHY the HELL should our products and services cost more due to EPA rules when places like India, China, Mexico, etc, etc don't have the types of rules we have to follow to be competitive.
The EPA ***** butt.......but on the same token, a company, GE for instance that makes products here and must follow a CRAPLOAD of EPA and OSHA regulations has compete with the very same GE that moves plants to Mexico, where OSHA and the EPA don't exist. If the EPA rules add 10 bucks to the bottom dollar, that is 10 bucks EXTRA in their pocket by moving the plant.
I'm just saying..........
Later,
Geo
[QUOTE=GeoFisher;429719]NO, I think it is a HORRIBLE thing, but the fact is......the GREENIES push Green this, and Green that, yet, the developing world will NEVER follow any of those Green rules. WHY the HELL should our products and services cost more due to EPA rules when places like India, China, Mexico, etc, etc don't have the types of rules we have to follow to be competitive.
The EPA ***** butt.......but on the same token, a company, GE for instance that makes products here and must follow a CRAPLOAD of EPA and OSHA regulations has compete with the very same GE that moves plants to Mexico, where OSHA and the EPA don't exist. If the EPA rules add 10 bucks to the bottom dollar, that is 10 bucks EXTRA in their pocket by moving the plant.
I'm just saying..........
Later,
Geo[/QUOTE]
What he just said.