[QUOTE=Moveon;526499]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming
The other group contains a very small percentage of scientist that work for Exon and other fossil fuel industries. There is a reason why the VAST MAJORITY of Climate Scientist tell us that Global Warming is real. They don't have to make up any thing. The data is there for all to see. Historical Global Temperatures are there for anyone to see. These are not just temperatures taken in the USA but from all over the World. That's what I mean by the word "Global". And it's not a one time thing in one place. It's an Average of all the temperatures that has risen.
There is a reason why the Ice sheets have melted and receded. Glaciers are receding like never before.
Funny how the Right never seems to have an answer for the receding glaciers as proof. They simply Ignore the facts and continue to attack Obama and Al Gore. I find that hilarious actually. They don't attack the pictures from NASA showing the ice sheets smaller now than they were in the past. And they don't attack the historical temperature records either. All they have to say is Obama blah blah blah! The data is there for you to look up. Why don't you just go to a reliable source like NOAA.
What ice sheets? Specific ones? What was the one these guys got stuck in? Does that area not count? Maybe they could have used your advice and looked at those pics you speak of before spending all that money to go and prove global warming exists not me because they were proved wrong...again.
If these guys are "your" global warming scientists and not the "other" scientists who challenge their data and they go off half cocked, careless and ignoring data that is supposed to exist to prove global warming and get stuck in ice that isn't supposed to be there or even be that thick then they need another field to go in because they are idiots.
I'm just a man living in Kentucky but if I was going on a trip somewhere I look into what I'm getting myself into before I go. You know simple things like is it cold there? What's the long range weather forecast? What are some of the local things do to....and all of that is available on the internet. That way i can pack according to the data i find.
I never realized that so called scientist and anyone who supports them are so careless but supposedly 100% correct and diligent with their studies and data collecting on global warming. Seems like they set the example of how careless these so called scientists are not me. How can anyone explain this? Lead by example is what comes to mind and if these guys are your leaders then you are in trouble.
Another thing you and other Obama supports seem to forget. The USA is not only made up of Left and Right I'm a independent Conservative and don't really support 100% of the GOP. Prolly more Libertarian than anything.
Oh well, I will agree to disagree about the data on Global Warming. It's skewed to gain more credibility than it deserves to scare people and get more money for their cause. It's political jousting on who controls the vote...nothing more. I think it's not 100% accurate and actually irresponsible of them to come with these published conclusions and then they go out and get stuck in ice so thick they can't even use ice breaking ships to get them out. Helicopters are needed because the ice is thicker than they have ever seem. Just makes them look like fools and is another case of global warming data being wrong.




Reply With Quote