Is there a trickle up policy?

[GeoFisher]

--
He has passed neither of them.

Ronald Reagan increased the debt by 218%
George Bush11 increased the debt by 86%

I'm sure you can do the math on Mr Obama's contribution.

These are these numbers I found, maybe you can find different ones and post them.

Again, you didn't provide numbers, you provided percentages.

So here are some numbers:

Reagan Years and Bush Years

1980's 907.7
2001 (a2) 5,807
2002 (a3) 6,228
2003 (a) 6,783
2004 (a) 7,379
2005 (a4) 7,933
2006 (a5) 8,507
2007 (a6) 9,008
2008 (a7) 10,025

So, using Math, I get 907.7 + (10,025 - 5807) for 5.125 Trillion TOTAL for bush and Reagan combined.

Now for Obama.......GAWD ****, those are some big numbers.........you sure you can count that high? And this is only through 2014.

2009 (a8) 11,910
2010 (a9) 13,562
2011 (a10) 14,790
2012 (a11) 16,066
2013 ~16,738
2014 ~17,152

17,152 - 11,910 = 5.252 Trillion.. So based on the NUMBERS I have provided, pulled from THIS LINK, Obama has surpassed Reagan and Bush Combined.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationa..._United_States

Note: the initial year for Reagan is all that was reported, but I will give you the assumption that he raised it by 2.2trillion dollars...........even at that rate, if you add the 1.5 trillion/ear that is expected for 2015 and 2016, Obama STILL beats the two Republicans combined by 1 trillion........

You like all other liberals love to spin and crunch **** to look the way you want, yea, the percentages you provided, taken from the democrat talking points do paint a different picture, but statistics my friend are about numbers, and you can paint that how ever the hell you want.

Bottom Line, I have provided the corresponding data from a reliable source to BACK my argument. Something the left is rare to do.

Good day, I'm done arguing with you tonight. Pick a number, and I will be glad to school your ass again tomorrow.

Later,

Geo

[Hlleonard]

Again, you didn't provide numbers, you provided percentages.

So here are some numbers:

Reagan Years and Bush Years

1980's 907.7
2001 (a2) 5,807
2002 (a3) 6,228
2003 (a) 6,783
2004 (a) 7,379
2005 (a4) 7,933
2006 (a5) 8,507
2007 (a6) 9,008
2008 (a7) 10,025

So, using Math, I get 907.7 + (10,025 - 5807) for 5.125 Trillion TOTAL for bush and Reagan combined.

Now for Obama.......GAWD ****, those are some big numbers.........you sure you can count that high? And this is only through 2014.

2009 (a8) 11,910
2010 (a9) 13,562
2011 (a10) 14,790
2012 (a11) 16,066
2013 ~16,738
2014 ~17,152

17,152 - 11,910 = 5.252 Trillion.. So based on the NUMBERS I have provided, pulled from THIS LINK, Obama has surpassed Reagan and Bush Combined.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationa..._United_States

Note: the initial year for Reagan is all that was reported, but I will give you the assumption that he raised it by 2.2trillion dollars...........even at that rate, if you add the 1.5 trillion/ear that is expected for 2015 and 2016, Obama STILL beats the two Republicans combined by 1 trillion........

You like all other liberals love to spin and crunch **** to look the way you want, yea, the percentages you provided, taken from the democrat talking points do paint a different picture, but statistics my friend are about numbers, and you can paint that how ever the hell you want.

Bottom Line, I have provided the corresponding data from a reliable source to BACK my argument. Something the left is rare to do.

Good day, I'm done arguing with you tonight. Pick a number, and I will be glad to school your ass again tomorrow.

Later,

Geo

--
If you go back and use the correct number to do the math the numbers you seem to be enchanted with are actually around 6 and a half trillion instead of the 5.2 you posted... The .907 trillion you used for your calculation is the debt that Mr. Carter left Mr. Reagan.... So in your head it is ok to double or triple the debt as long as the numbers themselves are smaller?... I guess that is good right wing economics.

Before you get into schooling somebody it might be a good idea to at least start at the right place in the text book.... You have a good day sir.

[GeoFisher]

--
If you go back and use the correct number to do the math the numbers you seem to be enchanted with are actually around 6 and a half trillion instead of the 5.2 you posted... The .907 trillion you used for your calculation is the debt that Mr. Carter left Mr. Reagan.... So in your head it is ok to double or triple the debt as long as the numbers themselves are smaller?... I guess that is good right wing economics.

Before you get into schooling somebody it might be a good idea to at least start at the right place in the text book.... You have a good day sir.

I guess you failed to read this part:

Note: the initial year for Reagan is all that was reported, but I will give you the assumption that he raised it by 2.2trillion dollars...........even at that rate, if you add the 1.5 trillion/ear that is expected for 2015 and 2016, Obama STILL beats the two Republicans combined by 1 trillion........

I stated WHAT you already pointed out..........and gave Reagan all the debt for the 1980's by giving the assumption that he raised it 2.2 trillion dollars.......

Even at that rate, what the hell don't you understand about the fact that Obama still raised the debt more than Bush and Reagan combined......

You will NEVER, EVER get it.

[Hlleonard]

I guess you failed to read this part:



I stated WHAT you already pointed out..........and gave Reagan all the debt for the 1980's by giving the assumption that he raised it 2.2 trillion dollars.......

Even at that rate, what the hell don't you understand about the fact that Obama still raised the debt more than Bush and Reagan combined......

You will NEVER, EVER get it.

--
lol... I guess I won't.