Search Fishin.com

Results 1 to 12 of 29

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,177
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by GeoFisher View Post
    How does an ICEBURG, floating in the water melt and displace more water?? Basic science disproves that completely.

    You can try this little experiment yourself. Put an ice cube in a glass of water. MARK the waterline. Come back an hour later, when the ice cube is melted............ENOUGH SAID.

    Later,

    Geo
    after you place the glass of water with the ice cube in it and mark the waterline, now lets call the glass of water the ocean. now lay a bag of ice next to the glass, { this can be the on land Glacier Ice } only have it placed above the glass and push a tube into the bag of ice with the other end in the glass. { or your ocean } now warm up the room and see if the melting bag of ice, { which would be the on land glacier ice } makes the water in the glass { or your ocean } rise above the waterline. a floating Iceberg may not displace more water, but an Ice Glacier above sea level that is melting and making it's way into the ocean, does indeed displace more water.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    New Albany, Indiana.
    Posts
    8,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by waterdog101 View Post
    after you place the glass of water with the ice cube in it and mark the waterline, now lets call the glass of water the ocean. now lay a bag of ice next to the glass, { this can be the on land Glacier Ice } only have it placed above the glass and push a tube into the bag of ice with the other end in the glass. { or your ocean } now warm up the room and see if the melting bag of ice, { which would be the on land glacier ice } makes the water in the glass { or your ocean } rise above the waterline. a floating Iceberg may not displace more water, but an Ice Glacier above sea level that is melting and making it's way into the ocean, does indeed displace more water.
    And yet another reason why I get pissed at you lefties..............Yea, I understand about water displacement.

    I wasn't talking about ice surrounding my ice cube in a cup. I was talking about the FREAKIN ICE cube in the cup, nothing else. I was trying to make it extremely simple for the simpletons around here.

    I guess I didn't quite reach my goal.

    Oh well..........

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,177
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by GeoFisher View Post
    And yet another reason why I get pissed at you lefties..............Yea, I understand about water displacement.

    I wasn't talking about ice surrounding my ice cube in a cup. I was talking about the FREAKIN ICE cube in the cup, nothing else. I was trying to make it extremely simple for the simpletons around here.

    I guess I didn't quite reach my goal.

    Oh well..........
    you had me confused, Moveon's post was talking about melting Glacier ice, and you asked, how does a iceberg floating in the water, displace more water. Moveon's post wasn't talking about an iceberg floating in the water, it was talking about warming temps melting the Glacier ice and making the ocean water level rise. I just assumed you were a Simpleton rightie and thought Moveon was talking about a floating iceberg melting, making the ocean rise. I was just trying to be helpful, making it extremely simple for you righties to see, Moveon was talking about melting Glacier ice, that is above sea level. melting and entering the ocean, making it rise. it's good to hear you say, you understand about water displacement. just back up and read your post where you replyed to Moveon's post and you should see where you had me confused.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    .
    Posts
    3,302
    Post Thanks / Like

    so what?

    It don't matter who's right or left. Man is changing HIS environment. He's moving into places where he never belonged. Building houses on flood plains, sea shores, diverting water to places it never was. No matter what we do as a species, we have a time clock,were going to die! Were finding new diseses we can't cure.We are changing crops that may not nourish us . As and if land mass shrinks,poulations also will change. If we are the epitemy of creation, top of the food chain,what do you cal flys, mosquitos, ticks,fleas, and other things tat prey on us?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    New Albany, Indiana.
    Posts
    8,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by kygorski View Post
    It don't matter who's right or left. Man is changing HIS environment. He's moving into places where he never belonged. Building houses on flood plains, sea shores, diverting water to places it never was. No matter what we do as a species, we have a time clock,were going to die! Were finding new diseses we can't cure.We are changing crops that may not nourish us . As and if land mass shrinks,poulations also will change. If we are the epitemy of creation, top of the food chain,what do you cal flys, mosquitos, ticks,fleas, and other things tat prey on us?
    I completely agree with that statement.........I just don't feel spending TRILLIONS and TRILLIONS of dollars on a made up problem like global warming is an effective use of tax money.

    The earth warms and the earth cools.......we don't know enough about the cycles and process to KNOW if we are a contributor. To think otherwise is extremely ignorant on our part. Maybe one day we will know enough, but I doubt it.

    Later,

    Geo

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    New Albany, Indiana.
    Posts
    8,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by waterdog101 View Post
    you had me confused, Moveon's post was talking about melting Glacier ice, and you asked, how does a iceberg floating in the water, displace more water. Moveon's post wasn't talking about an iceberg floating in the water, it was talking about warming temps melting the Glacier ice and making the ocean water level rise. I just assumed you were a Simpleton rightie and thought Moveon was talking about a floating iceberg melting, making the ocean rise. I was just trying to be helpful, making it extremely simple for you righties to see, Moveon was talking about melting Glacier ice, that is above sea level. melting and entering the ocean, making it rise. it's good to hear you say, you understand about water displacement. just back up and read your post where you replyed to Moveon's post and you should see where you had me confused.
    I understand how you got confused, and I read MoveON's post.....I also read the article,, and reread it......

    And then pulled out this little tidbit.........

    "
    If the whole glacier system melts, Joughin says, it would raise global sea levels about 24 inches (60 centimeters), he adds. The process will take a while, roughly 200 to 900 years, Joughin and colleagues estimate, depending on how fast temperatures rise and how much snow falls in the area.
    "

    So, let me get this straight...........if the entire freakin glacier.....meaning ALL of the Thwaites glacier on Antarctica's Amundsen Sea melts, then worldwide sea levels would raise 24 inches.

    Now, the doom and gloom folks love to play with absolutes. Do you really think the entire freakin glacier system there is going to melt. If you do, I have a land mass on the moon to sell you.

    No matter, lets tax the living **** out of people and spend multiple trillions of dollars on this because it is OBVIOUS that gubment spends our money extremely effectively.

    I don't even know why I try......

    Later,

    Geo

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,177
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by GeoFisher View Post
    I understand how you got confused, and I read MoveON's post.....I also read the article,, and reread it......

    And then pulled out this little tidbit.........

    "
    If the whole glacier system melts, Joughin says, it would raise global sea levels about 24 inches (60 centimeters), he adds. The process will take a while, roughly 200 to 900 years, Joughin and colleagues estimate, depending on how fast temperatures rise and how much snow falls in the area.
    "

    So, let me get this straight...........if the entire freakin glacier.....meaning ALL of the Thwaites glacier on Antarctica's Amundsen Sea melts, then worldwide sea levels would raise 24 inches.

    Now, the doom and gloom folks love to play with absolutes. Do you really think the entire freakin glacier system there is going to melt. If you do, I have a land mass on the moon to sell you.

    No matter, lets tax the living **** out of people and spend multiple trillions of dollars on this because it is OBVIOUS that gubment spends our money extremely effectively.

    I don't even know why I try......

    Later,

    Geo
    where did you read info that says, if all Antarctica's Glaciers melted, the ocean levels would only rise 24 inches? here is a link that says Antarctica's Ice Glaciers are 7,000 feet thick and if it melted the ocean would rise about 200 feet. and the Ice on Greenland alone would make the ocean rise 20 feet.
    http://science.howstuffworks.com/env...uestion473.htm

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    New Albany, Indiana.
    Posts
    8,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by waterdog101 View Post
    where did you read info that says, if all Antarctica's Glaciers melted, the ocean levels would only rise 24 inches? here is a link that says Antarctica's Ice Glaciers are 7,000 feet thick and if it melted the ocean would rise about 200 feet. and the Ice on Greenland alone would make the ocean rise 20 feet.
    http://science.howstuffworks.com/env...uestion473.htm
    You have to dig a little. " Ian Joughin, leader of the other research team, said that nothing can stop the collapse of the ice sheet, adding, "There's no stabilization mechanism." So instead of arbitrarily believing the leftist ******** from CNN, I went directly to the source Ian Joughin.......and the quote I put in came directly from him from the national geographic article linked in the LEFTIST CNN reporters ******** report.

    Unlike most who simply want to spout ********, I tend to want to read as much as I can, and make my own decisions.

    If it will indeed take hundreds and hundreds of years, and in fact it is only the region I quoted in my post, AND it will only rise 24 inches, who gives a rip.

    Now, do your own research......and come back at me, but not too soon, as I will be fighting my own glacier melt in Quetico in a couple days........

    Yea, in 30 years of tripping up there, I've never had 20 inches of ice on interior lakes on Memorial Day. Isn't global warming great..........

    Later,

    Geo

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,998
    Post Thanks / Like

    Loony toons web site

    He gets it from the Internet.... Loony Tunes! and Fixed News Corp. Owned and operated by Fossil Fuels Inc.



    Quote Originally Posted by waterdog101 View Post
    where did you read info that says, if all Antarctica's Glaciers melted, the ocean levels would only rise 24 inches? here is a link that says Antarctica's Ice Glaciers are 7,000 feet thick and if it melted the ocean would rise about 200 feet. and the Ice on Greenland alone would make the ocean rise 20 feet.
    http://science.howstuffworks.com/env...uestion473.htm

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    New Albany, Indiana.
    Posts
    8,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Moveon View Post
    He gets it from the Internet.... Loony Tunes! and Fixed News Corp. Owned and operated by Fossil Fuels Inc.
    Got it from national geographic......

    And yea, Moose I'm not a scientist.....And yea, I do understand about displacement, and yea I do understand about melt ABOVE the GROUND.

    The original article that started this whole my **** is bigger than your **** argument was about a very specific area that is having a collapse....that area, is posted in my response. I'm not going to post it again. LOOK the **** up if you want to know about it.

    The area where the collapse occurred has some interesting geography. Again.......go READ the freakin stuff for yourself. I'm not going to rehash it here. Warm water intrusion occurred as has occurred tens of thousands of times through the history of our earth. That caused a piece.....a very small piece of a glacier to collapse, and melt.

    Holy HELL.......we're all doomed, right. Well, not quite. The way and method that collapse occurred can only happen in a very limited amount of the glaciers there.....less than 1% of the total mass. Yep. that is going to flood the world. You call me out and tell me I"m not a scientist, but I will tell you this.....it is the IGNORANCE of scientists like yourself that continue the perpetuation of a myth......Sad.

    Go EDUCATE yourself for once.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,998
    Post Thanks / Like
    If you understood then you Purposely misdirected everyone in your first post that I responded too.

    What you failed to realize is that the ice is slipping into the ocean but it started higher up on land before it went into the ocean. Snow that falls into the water melts unless the water's covered with ice. Ice tend to float up on the surface. remember?

    And the glaciers that are melting are NOT small by any means. Some are as huge as many of the larger "STATE" in the USA. These are huge Sheets of Ice.

    I'm pretty sure that I read about another huge piece of ice that melted and fell of the edge of the continent up in North America somewhere off the East Coast of North America. That huge piece of ice is floating up in the North Atlantic and was said to be a traffic hazard for ships in that area.

    To deny that the glaciers all over the world are melting more than solidifying is just crazy talk by some people who can't see the truth if it were put right in front of their face.

    Again I see that no one cares about the melting ice or the slow rising ocean as it's not going to have an immediate effect on them or me. And I pretty sure that I don't need anymore formal education at my age. Although I could go back to collect and take some fun classes.

    There you go over exaggerating something that I never said. I never said we were all doomed and you know that.

    So all the rest of your blabber after that statement is non sense.

    You made your bed I just told you to go lay in it! You were the one practically claiming to be doing scientific experiments with a glass of water. Did you or did you not explain an experiment on melting ice cube in a glass of water? It sounded to me like you were trying to disprove the Global Warming Theory and the rising ocean levels with that silly experiment. So I simply called you out on that and explained to you why the experiment was not appropriate. I then explained why the Highly Educated Researchers and other Scientist are all saying that the melting Glaciers and ice are causing the Ocean levels to rise Slowly.

    Note Here: No one is saying that the sky is falling. Your lame attempt to try to say that I said anything like that is absurd. I'm not sure why you do things like that. I guess you can answer that question for yourself.


    I called you out on your false premise and that's all I did. Sorry if you took that wrong.

    As for my education it's all good. I would suggest that you take your own advice! Educate yourself better before you go around making misstatements that make you look foolish.





    Quote Originally Posted by GeoFisher View Post
    Got it from national geographic......

    And yea, Moose I'm not a scientist.....And yea, I do understand about displacement, and yea I do understand about melt ABOVE the GROUND.

    The original article that started this whole my **** is bigger than your **** argument was about a very specific area that is having a collapse....that area, is posted in my response. I'm not going to post it again. LOOK the **** up if you want to know about it.

    The area where the collapse occurred has some interesting geography. Again.......go READ the freakin stuff for yourself. I'm not going to rehash it here. Warm water intrusion occurred as has occurred tens of thousands of times through the history of our earth. That caused a piece.....a very small piece of a glacier to collapse, and melt.

    Holy HELL.......we're all doomed, right. Well, not quite. The way and method that collapse occurred can only happen in a very limited amount of the glaciers there.....less than 1% of the total mass. Yep. that is going to flood the world. You call me out and tell me I"m not a scientist, but I will tell you this.....it is the IGNORANCE of scientists like yourself that continue the perpetuation of a myth......Sad.

    Go EDUCATE yourself for once.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    New Albany, Indiana.
    Posts
    8,955
    Post Thanks / Like

    Yea, STILL not a scientist.......

    Aw.......never mind..........simply not worth it.
    Last edited by GeoFisher; 06-11-2014 at 07:31 PM. Reason: removed my comments.........

Similar Threads

  1. melting pot, thank God it's so.
    By waterdog101 in forum "Off Topic" Posts
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-03-2012, 12:10 PM
  2. melting key
    By 4given in forum Kentucky Discussion Board
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-04-2012, 04:03 PM
  3. melting lead
    By dissel in forum How to Make Lures, Rods & other Fishin Stuff
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-02-2011, 08:19 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •