Quote Originally Posted by Hlleonard View Post
Does anybody here believe the lower and middle class are in better shape today that they were before reaganomics?

Does anybody here believe the upper class hasn't gained wealth as compared to the other two?

Does anybody here believe the end result is not directly caused by the idea that if you let the rich make all the money they can they will allow that to "trickle down"?... sure they will but only if you are able to force that trickle down.

Does anybody here believe cutting those taxes did not lead to the debt boondongle we have today, if you do. look at the top tax rates before and after reagan... trickle down was a sham that only benefited the wealthy.

Does anybody remember what Bush1 referred to trickle down as?
31 percent: Top tax rate in 1991
50 percent: Top tax rate in 1986
70 percent: Top tax rate in 1980
91 percent: Top tax rate in 1963
Voodoo Economics.........and BUSH 1 was wrong.........

The problem with your chart is that we're now in a situation where people don't work. We have 41 million families that don't pay federal taxes. IN fact, you and I pay them on average about $4000.00 EACH. lets see 41,000,000 * 4000.00 ****, that is one freakin gigantic number.

That my friends............is about 164 BILLION dollars given to dumb **** sum bitches for making bad decisions.

Now lets, enforce some federal tax collection on those jokers.......say 10%, which is a whole hell lot less than it was under Reagan. That 10% would be a nice number too.....about 80 Billion.

Hell don't look now, but with one fail swoop of my PEN, President GEO would eliminate 1/3 of our budget deficit by eliminating one of the biggest tit sucking programs our country has ever known.

Yea, dope yourself up, get laid, pop out a few kids, dope yourself up some more, drink and party a little....next thing you know, you're a gubment statistic sucking off the tit of uncle Sam.

I say cut off the TIT.