If that were to be the case then no Div-1 school would risk punishment by recruiting a kid that had even a remote chance of leaving in one year. In that scenario the best high school players would actually be punished because they have worked very hard to become the best. What would happen to the kids that did have a remote or better chance of becoming a one and done? Would they get lucky like Kobe, Dwight or LeBron and be drafted out of high school? Maybe. Would they lose a chance at getting a higher education and/or become a tax paying NBA player? More than likely. The problem does NOT lie at the college level, it lies in the greed of the NBA's ruling body and their quest for more of everything. They are the ones that have the power to stop the one and done trend with one rule and it is a simple rule to enforce. You can't play in the NBA until you are at least 20 years old. In the broad spectrum of things college basketball is not very important when compared with the welfare of young adults. Their future and them being able to become contributing members of society far outweighs any concerns we may have about watching boring basketball on TV. If that means a few players becoming a one and done then I am willing to sacrifice a little quality of my entertainment time.



Reply With Quote