Fish and Wildlife is charged with managing the fishery and implementing regulations in order to keep them viable. The complaints about tournaments are blocked ramps, aggressive/hostile anglers, and dead fish. With the officers observing things, documenting tournament use, counting dead fish, and fielding complaints from others trying to use the lake they will have direct first hand information that can be used to properly manage the fishery. That is for the benefit of everyone including the tournament anglers. Or would you rather have them implement regulations based on viral news story and public complaints?
People were over fishing the catfish on Taylorsville lake. Fish and Wildlife gathered first hand information and implemented creel limits to keep the fishery in good shape. That is how things are supposed to work. If tournaments want to start keeping all the fish they catch, then I imagine more restrictive creel limits will be implemented which would be a negative things for tournaments. Again the only people who can prevent the regulations are the people causing the problem in the first place. If the tournament organizers aren't going to take responsibility for the negative impacts their tournaments are causing then they will have to deal with additional regulations and fees that will come.
That is my whole point. The tournament organizers and anglers should be pro-active in reducing any type of negative impact or complaint and keep the government out of it.Fisherman should want to lead on this and be out front self examining and looking for ways to best ensure the long term success of the sport. But be careful what you wish for when you seek for more regulations and enforcement.




Reply With Quote