Second place is ?

[Tim_T]

http://www.mercurynews.com/politics-...s-prices-obama

Sorry, forgot the link

[waterdog101]

http://www.mercurynews.com/politics-...s-prices-obama

Sorry, forgot the link

thanks for the link, I new the world demand kinda pushes the price up or down, but the link was a good read, I hadn't read one where it broke down the two partys terms, in equal months and compaired the price per gallon, in the real world, any President is just a puppet on a string, bought and payed for before they take office, the Billionaires tell the President what to do, or so it seams, I truly wish it wasn't so, but I think it is.

[sweetwater]

the Billionaires tell the President what to do, or so it seams, I truly wish it wasn't so, but I think it is.

If he wins who would will tell net worth $4,000,000,000 Donald what to do?

[waterdog101]

If he wins who would will tell net worth $4,000,000,000 Donald what to do?

well that is a very good question, where he didn't take money from the super pacs, he has a chance to do what he thinks is right, but and it is a big but, I can't see trump getting anything done, for one reason he is outside the Republican click, and the biggest reason, the senate and congress are bought and payed for by the Billionaires, so they won't pass anything the money guys tell them not to. so I think the question should be, instead of who will tell trump what to do, what will the Billionaires " super pacs " tell the senate and congress, to let Trump do. he may get a couple things done on his own , by useing his Executive power, that was allotted to him, from a section of the constitution. like Obama had to do.. .

[sweetwater]

like Obama had to do.

Had to do?? He doesn't have to skirt Congress. He should respect the authorities of the States, the Congress and the intent of our founding fathers but instead he's looking for loopholes in the law so he can cram his personal agendas down our throats. Obama has promised gun control by executive power too so I'm going to assume that he's going into the ghettos and get all the illegal and stolen guns right now...

Oh, he meant take away the legal rights of good citizens to buy guns.... Gotcha

[waterdog101]

Had to do?? He doesn't have to skirt Congress. He should respect the authorities of the States, the Congress and the intent of our founding fathers but instead he's looking for loopholes in the law so he can cram his personal agendas down our throats. Obama has promised gun control by executive power too so I'm going to assume that he's going into the ghettos and get all the illegal and stolen guns right now...

Oh, he meant take away the legal rights of good citizens to buy guns.... Gotcha

I thought we were talking about Trump, and I made the statement, Trump would have to do like Obama and use his executive power to get anything done, without those around him wanting to help. it wasn't a had to do question?, it was a had to do statement, when Obama was first elected, our country was a mess, instead of washington trying to help fix the mess, their leader Mitch Mcconnell said his # one priority, was to make Obama a one term President, " which he failed at really bad " so thats why Obama used his executive power " you call it loopholes "to get something done, I have guns myself, my whole family have guns, we get together sometimes and target practice together, I have a daughter that can shoot as good as I can, and I'm for gun control, not taking peoples guns kind of control, but taking the fully auto assult weapons off the market and streets like Obama talks about doing, I'm going to assume he is no where near the ghettos, and assume he don't care how many pistols and hunting rifles a person owns, he is trying to control the assault weapons, and close the loopholes, where anyone can buy guns from a gun dealer without a background check. not take good citizens rights, just make sure a good citizen has a clean background, and hasn't been in and out of a mental institution before buying a gun.

[kygorski]

There are more important things than gun rights.I've always been for open carry for everyone, regardless! Yes some folks need protection FROM the police. YES I'm on the government tit, but so are farmers oil companies utilities states and cities.And many private concerns. Its a big trough, and we all line up to get our chance at it.What we need to teach is responsibilities for our actions.WE are resposible for our actions, when you put your ass on the line, pay for it.

[sweetwater]

It quickly comes to guns because the right to bear arms is very important to a lot of folks. It is not a coincidence that the second amendment was second only the First Amendment which guaranteed freedom of religion, free speech, free press, freedom to assemble and the right to complain about the government. Of course that amendment has already taken a good beating in the past seven years.

[kygorski]

We don't want the first amendment anymore. When you need a permit to gather together for a cause, you lost it.How about freedom FROM religion? We gave that up also.Free Press? HAH when three or four individuals own most of the press, we hear what they want us to hear. And it seems we love our loss of privacy, just look at the amount of security cameras we tolerate.Our communications are monitored,and a lot of our private information is for sale by other interested parties.