Search Fishin.com

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 13 to 15 of 15
  1. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    New Albany, Indiana.
    Posts
    8,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=Moveon;553320]
    Quote Originally Posted by GeoFisher View Post
    Are you serious..........
    . This is the kind of crap that really chaps my can with LEFTISTS.

    There is evidence, yet you simply refuse to see the evidence.

    I have not seen any credible evidence that any of those emails on Hillary's Private Serve were marked Classified at the time she first received them.

    What I heard and read is that they are later relabeled after the fact.

    So your facts have no credibility IMHO.
    "
    Clinton did sign a Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement, in which she pledged to safeguard classified information whether “marked or unmarked classified information, including oral communications,” as defined by Executive Order 12958. (That was later superseded by Executive Order 13526.)

    Interestingly, in that executive order, the secretary of state is given the authority to classify and declassify information at the “top secret” level. In other words, Clinton had presidential authority to decide what State Department information was classified or not.
    "

    "
    As the saga has dragged on, Clinton’s terminology has become ever more nuanced. When she first discussed her private-email arrangement in detail last March, her staff distributed a Q&A that flatly stated that no classified material was sent or received by Clinton at her private email address. Now she says the emails were not marked classified:

    'When you receive information, of course, there has to be some markings, some indication that someone down the chain thought that this was classified and that was not the case.'

    "

    She mishandled classified information and her staff mishandled classified information.

    The fact that you want to give her a pass on that is quite sad.

  2. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,998
    Post Thanks / Like
    Obama can see the most classified information as President of the USA. As such he knows what's suppose to be secrete and what's not. Hillary, our next President will have the same powers.

    George you need to state your sources of your information on those Executive Orders. Hilary never disclosed any classified information to people who were not suppose to see it.

    You and your GOP Thugs have been trying to slander Hillary every since she held office. Even when her husband was the President you guys were throwing mud at her and bill. It's was obvious to me when you guys claimed that she and Billed killed one of their best friends. And during the impeachment proceedings which ended in FAILURE for the GOP.

    [QUOTE=GeoFisher;553321]
    Quote Originally Posted by Moveon View Post

    "
    Clinton did sign a Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement, in which she pledged to safeguard classified information whether “marked or unmarked classified information, including oral communications,” as defined by Executive Order 12958. (That was later superseded by Executive Order 13526.)

    Interestingly, in that executive order, the secretary of state is given the authority to classify and declassify information at the “top secret” level. In other words, Clinton had presidential authority to decide what State Department information was classified or not.
    "

    "
    As the saga has dragged on, Clinton’s terminology has become ever more nuanced. When she first discussed her private-email arrangement in detail last March, her staff distributed a Q&A that flatly stated that no classified material was sent or received by Clinton at her private email address. Now she says the emails were not marked classified:

    'When you receive information, of course, there has to be some markings, some indication that someone down the chain thought that this was classified and that was not the case.'

    "

    She mishandled classified information and her staff mishandled classified information.

    The fact that you want to give her a pass on that is quite sad.

  3. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,998
    Post Thanks / Like

    Getting Back to the OP subject matter

    http://www.courierpress.com/business...69443682.xhtml

    Wondering why Apple helped the FBI hack into their I phones in the past but not now? Now apple is appealing the Judges order to help the FBI get the information off the terrorist Iphone.

    Before there were 9 Supreme Court Justices that would support the FBI. Now today there are only 8 Justices. Maybe the CEO of apple thinks that the lower courts will side with him and the SCOTUS will not be a factor in this case of tracking down Terrorists.

    Another example of the GOP obstructing our government and trying to tear this country apart.

    Funny that Obama is vetting a GOP Governor as a possible nominee to the US Supreme Court. Will McConnell still sit on his hands and not do anything to move the process forward. McConnell should be removed from office for his failure to act and his threats.

Similar Threads

  1. Fried Apple Pie
    By Tyme2fish in forum Photos
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-01-2014, 07:07 PM
  2. Apple products
    By DJD in forum "Off Topic" Posts
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-20-2012, 09:13 PM
  3. JAIL TIME!
    By kygorski in forum "Off Topic" Posts
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 01-27-2012, 04:28 PM
  4. Take me to jail (humor)
    By Tim_T in forum "Off Topic" Posts
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-18-2010, 07:05 PM
  5. For Sale Apple Iphone 16gb For $260usd,apple Iphone 16gb 3g For $270usd
    By greall in forum Boats - Buy, Sell, Discuss
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-15-2008, 08:45 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •