[QUOTE=Moveon;553320]
Quote Originally Posted by GeoFisher View Post
Are you serious..........
. This is the kind of crap that really chaps my can with LEFTISTS.

There is evidence, yet you simply refuse to see the evidence.

I have not seen any credible evidence that any of those emails on Hillary's Private Serve were marked Classified at the time she first received them.

What I heard and read is that they are later relabeled after the fact.

So your facts have no credibility IMHO.
"
Clinton did sign a Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement, in which she pledged to safeguard classified information whether “marked or unmarked classified information, including oral communications,” as defined by Executive Order 12958. (That was later superseded by Executive Order 13526.)

Interestingly, in that executive order, the secretary of state is given the authority to classify and declassify information at the “top secret” level. In other words, Clinton had presidential authority to decide what State Department information was classified or not.
"

"
As the saga has dragged on, Clinton’s terminology has become ever more nuanced. When she first discussed her private-email arrangement in detail last March, her staff distributed a Q&A that flatly stated that no classified material was sent or received by Clinton at her private email address. Now she says the emails were not marked classified:

'When you receive information, of course, there has to be some markings, some indication that someone down the chain thought that this was classified and that was not the case.'

"

She mishandled classified information and her staff mishandled classified information.

The fact that you want to give her a pass on that is quite sad.