1). We don't know it all yet..........Hillary has yet to testify, and she's about to be indicted for other abuses.
Oh, and the Ambassador was about to Leave Libya due to the security concerns HE HAD.......So yea, I blame the State department and Hillary Clinton exclusively. It is sad that you cannot see that.
2). Chemical weapons used in Syria came from IRAQ. AND the CIA had a covert operation to buy and destroy chemical weapons....so to say they didn't exist and that BUSH went to war over a lie is incorrect.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/16/wo...l-weapons.html
3). Cocaine use , while reprehensible and clearly not presidential, occurred in his youth . After he became a christian he gave up his vices.........You're a Christian, right? And while we're at it.....when BUSH addressed it, he neither acknowledged it , or denied it. I think there is enough circumstantial evidence for me to say he regularly used cocaine, just like there is enough evidence for me to say hillary hid classified information and is significantly involved in the failures at Benghazi.
You look extremely foolish to be using the circumstantial evidence about Bush and not the circumstantial evidence about Hillary.
Just saying.
Later,
Geo
Later,
Geo




Reply With Quote