confused

[Moveon]

Amendments are very very, VERY HARD to overturn.........or change.

Ain't happening........

( 2/3 of house and
2/3 of the senate)

or 2/3 of the states in a convention of states.

And then 3/4 of the states legislative bodies must ratify the amendment.

NOPE, not EVER.

"
Article Five of the United States Constitution describes the process whereby the Constitution, the nation's frame of government, may be altered. Altering the Constitution consists of proposing an amendment or amendments and subsequent ratification. Amendments may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a convention of states called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.[1] To become part of the Constitution, an amendment must be ratified by either—as determined by Congress—the legislatures of three-quarters of the states or state ratifying conventions in three-quarters of the states.[2] The vote of each state (to either ratify or reject a proposed amendment) carries equal weight, regardless of a state's population or length of time in the Union.
"

The problem is that the **** anti gun idiots want to use and have used the Supreme Court to change the meaning of the 2nd amendment instead of using Article 5 and that really pisses me off.

[dragmerc]

i see all these huggy pictures of the sheriff and several anti-gun politicians.
are these photo shopped?
and i hear ALL the deputies were told to NOT go in the school. is this true?
and all these protests happened instantaneously without organization?
i still say there's something going on here.