Quote Originally Posted by Moveon View Post
Trump is so pissed off at his legal team because they are not going anywhere. Rudi is a terrible lawyer. This election is all over but the counting. Most of Trump's stupid lawsuits are thrown out of court already.

Jan 20th is coming no matter what Trump does. The voters decide who is our next president not lawyers. The voters have spoken. The highest voter turnout in the History of the United States have Spoken.

PA's legislature set the rules on how to county the ballots in PA and Trump is losing. Soon they will declare Biden the winner in PA and then the President-Elect.

Like I said you can dream on all you want but it won't change a thing.

Enjoy smoking your Pipe. Biden is ahead in NV, AZ, PA and even GA. So stick that in your pipe and smoke it dude.
There are lots of options..........LOTS.

This would THROW a gigantic wrench into the mess, but Georgia and every other state can assign the electors to WHOEVER they want, if the wanted, and it would be completely constitutional.

Now that would absolutely destroy the faith in the electorate, but it is possible:


"
As the 2016 election reminded the country, the president is chosen by the Electoral College, not the popular vote. There are 538 electors, and a candidate needs 270 of them to win. Currently, every state assigns electors to the candidate who won the popular vote statewide. (Two states add a twist that’s irrelevant here.) But the Constitution does not require states to assign their electors on the basis of the statewide vote. It does not even require a statewide vote. Rather, it explains that each state “shall appoint” its electors “in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct.” In other words, each state legislature gets to decide how electors are appointed—and, by extension, who gets their votes.

Today, every state legislature has delegated this task to the people. But at first, state legislatures just did it themselves. In the first presidential election, for instance, the legislatures of Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, New Jersey, and South Carolina appointed electors directly. Eventually, every state moved toward the modern system. But the Supreme Court confirmed in 1892’s McPherson v. Blacker that states were free to revert to the old method, and in 2000’s Bush v. Gore, the court reiterated this point. The majority declared that the state legislature “may, if it so chooses, select the electors itself,” and retains authority to “take back the power to appoint electors” even after switching to a statewide vote.

Put simply, it is perfectly constitutional for a state legislature to scrap statewide elections for president and appoint electors itself. It would also be constitutional for a state legislature to disregard the winner of the statewide vote and assign electors to the loser. And because the Constitution grants legislatures the authority to pick electors this way, Congress cannot stop them.

"

What is not unclear.......can a state do that after the fact........doubtful, but who knows.