So,

IN the lawsuit that Palin filed against the New York Times........

The judge determined that malice could not be shown, even though the editor deliberately manipulated images that changed targets for congressional districts to putting the targets over house members in that district.

I honestly think the judge "punted".

This is all based on Sullivan v NYT from the 60's, and I definitely believe Palin will probably take this to the supreme court, where the court might re investigate the Sullivan v NYT case.

It is a free speech issue, but I personally believe Sullivan v NYT got it wrong.

WE shall see.

Later,

Geo