Watched the coverage. Going to watch more. Given the stated mission of those that form the panel, I think what is reported will tell us all a lot about how professionally and competently the group performed their impartial investigation. So far, I’ve seen evidence presented, and then conclusions drawn that don’t relate to the evidence presented, and assumptions or opinions stated as factual findings.
So will continue to watch and let what is stated as findings be laid out then draw my conclusions not based on what the panel says but what the evidence shows.



Reply With Quote