Quote Originally Posted by ZoraSpook View Post
I think in some cases the fed stepped in an took over centralized control of programs to insure the states at their level didn't screw them up. Not all states and not a blanket statement, but in some cases the need is for uniformity in implementation as opposed to allowing every state to do the same thing but different ways.

Just for argument, look at KY, FLA, and TX, and the way they do things and get things done VS CA, OR, WA, and WI, as we as NY states?

And I do support equality in implementation, as we saw back in the early 1900's with home loans and red zones, etc, the need for a federal standard occurred because of unfair and unequal implementation at state levels.

Just thoughts.
Rational and convincing, I get it. However:

The feds have overstepped their constitutional authority by far IMO, and politicians/federal agencies selectively enforce the law.

The federal government screws up most things they get involved with badly. If one can figure out ways to do things the most expensive and inefficient way humanly possible, the fed has a job for them.

There are blaring alarms going off, and it seems no one is listening. The IRS has long since been used as a weapon against political opponents, and the current administration just hired tens of thousands of new agents. The actions (and inactions) of the top federal law enforcement agency, the FBI over the last few years clearly shows its become a political weapon. These are the kinds of things that only happen in places like Venezuela right?