>WRONG!!!!!
>The wraps around the bobber will
>weaken your line MUCH more
>than the Palomar Knot will.
>How many fish have you
>guys that wrap the line
>lost by breakoffs at the
>bobber?
>The Coan Method may create 3
>knots, but if you use
>the Palomar Knot, there is
>no weakening of the line
>by a knot. Tests indicate
>that the Palomar is actually
>as strong as the line.
>
>Not to mention the fact that
>the Power Pro or Fire
>Line is a stronger line
>that you can tie that
>almost NO smallmouth COULD break
>anyway. Only the Fluorocarbon line
>will break and you can
>use up to 8 LB
>test with Fluorocarbon although I
>recommend no bigger than 6
>Lb.
>Unless you rewrap your line about
>every 10 to 15 casts
>the wraps will compress and
>fish will compress the line.
>Each time you weaken the
>line more by crushing it,
>or it wraps around itself
>cutting into itself.
>Jim Dicken
>www.FloatandFly.com
You guys are the 'experts' on this ... I've never FnF fished for Bass. But, for the sake of arguement (in a gentlemanly manner, of course):
WHY would a line "wrapped" around a solid brass bobber clamp, be any more likely to break than a "knot" tied around a solid brass ring of a 3way swivel ?? The wrapped line isn't "crushed" by the power of the bobber spring. If it is wrapped in side by side coils on the bobber hook, what's to make it cross over itself and thus dig into itself, when the pressure of fighting a fish is applied ? A wrapped line is the same pound test, anywhere along its length ... and any knot is a crushed line at the point where the "wraps" go around the main line. Even a Palomar is double wrapped around the hook/clamp .. plus the crushing effect of the "knot" wrapping. Why would one be any stronger than the other ? The dynamics just don't seem to be all that much different.
I'm thinking in terms of "perfect" knot tying, and side by side line wraps on the bobber stem ... not haphazardly doing either one. It would seem that side by side line wraps would be just as strong as the double looped line, of a Palomar knot, wrapped around the swivel ring. Could it be the flurocarbon line that's at fault here ?? Does it not take well to being wrapped in tiny coils ? How do the two methods compare - when flurocarbon line is used from reel to jig (tied vs wrapped) ... taking out the extra pound test factor of PowerPro/Fireline ?? And if you "need" to use PP/FL ... why not wrap IT around the bobber stem, and tie the flurocarbon to it using UNI knots ??
I'm not asking these questions to start any arguments, polarize the believers in the two versions, or compromise the loyalty of either camp to their respective mentors ... I'm seriously interested in hearing both sides views. ...... cp



Reply With Quote