Thanks I appreciate having real input from the field. But your response does raise a few other questions too. When you said that hunting and fishing license money should pay for park operation costs, I assume you are only talking about IDNR operated parks and not county, city federal, etc. Have you made any kind of calculations to see what effect that might have on the cost of those licenses? I haven’t, and I can’t really guess what the end result might be; but on the surface of that idea I’m seeing another argument come up when people balk at paying for a $350 resident fishing license. Or did you mean to simply transfer some of the existing license fee money that now funds Fish and Wildlife and enforcement programs over to parks?