OK I need an answer... Cedar Creek AGAIN

[dcbasser]

I still think it is a good idea so I say run with it and see what happens.

[Cobra190]

I agree, run with it. Even if it goes no further than this site, it would be a great tool for inter site bragging and some good conversation at your get togethers. I think this is a wonderful site you are running with the majority of folks using it being very respectful and helpful.
So I repeat... Go for it Jim,

[JimDicken]

OK,,, I am in a better mood today. Still ticked at Sprint but hey I will get over it.
We are going with it as outlined. The list of fish on the Cedar Creek Lake Report are the ones we will recognize for now.
Eventually we will try to work on other lakes.
I have posted some lake records on reports in the past. MOST of those are Current State Records.
Lets fill up Cedar Creek and then I will start to take nominations for fish on lakes that are older and have had PLENTY of BIG fish caught. Most likely I will set a minimum for some of the larger Reservoirs that is realistic. IF you have a fish that you cuaght on a major reservoir and know the weight and have a picture we will set that number and list you as the holder till a larger fish is submitted.
Jim

[Danny]

Dew, I need you to get those pictures of all those huge fish we caught at KY lake emailed to me so I can forward them on to Jim for the beginning of the KY Lake record. Maybe I can hold it for about 15 minutes before Dave S. sends his pics in. LMAO

Danny