I agree with every post above, Stripers in Dale hollow would be a big mistake. With that fact established due to the nature of the striper. How good could The river fishery be for trout if there were no stripers there? We,Ky spend a lot of money stocking trout and if there were no stripers I would think the tourism dollars to catch big trout would far outweigh the money that comes in for striper fishing below the dam. I agree what has been posted that Lake cumberland is good for stripers and it should be the source and the tourism engine for that species. The river should be for trout and if managed so it would be better. There are stripers in the river all the way to the face of the dam. That situation has killed trout fisheries out west in tailwater situations and makes ours only marginal. If stripers in the tailwaters is a good thing shouldn't Ky also stock them in the river? And if tenn thinks they are good for our trout river then would they be good for the lake in their state where they stock trout. We have already answered that question, No.


Reply With Quote