>do it right...want big fish? set big fish rules!!! i say lake
>fork rules... 16-24 slot 1 under 1 over . better yet none
>over. what a great tourney for you tourney boys,nothing over
>15 and 15/16. wipes out 1 big fish winning don't you think?
>how many ntournaments have been one by someone with 1 small
>keeper and 1 big one,beating someone with 5 ave keepers. If it
>was up to me,cedar creek would have been closed to fishing for
>5 years then catch and release only .worked for other lakes
That worked great for Lake Fork for a while. But now they have a problem where they are NOT getting any fish over 9 pounds any more. They used to get 2 or 3 a year over 14... but only 1 has been weighed in the last few years. They suspect that too many fish in the slot to 26 inch size are now in the lake. Kentucky is NOT going to produce numbers of fish over 8 or 9 pounds setting the limit too high will actually create a similar situation. It WILL in my opinion work for a few years on smallmouth but I do not believe that it will work for Largemouth here. The slot limit on Dale is a good example. Continuing numbers of fish in the 5 to 7 pound range are increasing and I expect we will soon see some 8's and 9's. BUT a 25000 acre lake can only hold so many fish. Eventually overpopulation will create a stunting, and while it may happen at say the 7 pound range I dont see anyone complaining.
MY POINT and I finally got to it.. is this.. Once in a while you have to take the slot off and cull the lake to allow for the bigger fish. Just my opinion. I am fine with a slot limit to a point, but at some point you have to take the slot off and cull the numbers back say for 3 months or 6 months in a year. Then go back to the slot. It may not happen for 5 years, but like Texas we could see a situation where our lakes over populate fish in the 5 to 7 pound range.. (Yeah that would be a tragedy wouldn''t it? LOL) and we stop getting the larger fish..
WHAT AM I COMPLAINING ABOUT.



Reply With Quote