Court Decision on Private Waters on a River.....

[JimDicken]

While I would not normally disagree, this was a US Court albeit district and the waters in question are Federal Waters, in a Federal Waterway so the fact that precedent is set someplace or any place ... is not good for fishermen, and for hunters.
It means that law is up to who is in office and who is appointed to the Supreme Court.
Read the article. The judge ruled that the waters are usable but ONLY for through navigation.
This means more money spent, and more money wasted when the law as written is clear that these are PUBLIC Waters.
Jim

[bje]

I could not find the article, but like I said, US District Courts often have different rulings from district to district on the same issue. Lets hope it would be decided differently in ours.