
Originally Posted by
geobass
I have heard this statement before about fishable water and Kentucky. Lakes, streams, rivers. Second only to Alaska. Where is this information coming from? Not saying it is wrong, but I would like to know. I'm from Michigan and it has over 10,000 lakes plus 1000's of miles of rivers and streams. And lets not forget 4 of the 5 great lakes. Minnesota has over 11,000 lakes, as well as 1000's of miles of streams and rivers. Both of those states I would bet have more registered boats then Kentucky. I spent 9 plus years in Kentucky and have fished all the major lakes, and they all have something to offer. I have fished in about 15 different states and I would rate Kentucky in the bottom half, sorry if I have offened anyone.jmo