McClellan's new book

[DJD]

Say what you really mean! Lol...Take it easy man, I just don't agree with you is that ok?
BTW, we all watch more than Fox. It's not a bad station when you want an educated opinion.*smile*

[jcb]

Finally Scott grew a pair

It's hard for me to conceive of a reality in which pimping a supposed tell-all book on the talk show circuit is equated to "growing a pair".

I don't care where you fall politically. It's not "growing a pair"--it's cashing in on your time as an insider before your 15 minutes of fame runs out.

[apb]

Right, thats it. After all of these revelations of wrong doing by the Bush admin, I for one will not be voting for Bush in 08. Nope, not gonna do it, wouldn't be prudent at this juncture...

It's hard for me to conceive of a reality in which pimping a supposed tell-all book on the talk show circuit is equated to "growing a pair".

I don't care where you fall politically. It's not "growing a pair"--it's cashing in on your time as an insider before your 15 minutes of fame runs out.

I agree. If the man had any integrity at all he would have spoken up when he was part of the admin and could have made a difference. Taking about it now just means he is a chump trying to cash in. I mean, he comments on Rove being part of the outing of Plame as a CIA opp, but kept quiet when there was a justice dept investigation?????

As far as Hannity and Rush (you mean that junkie is still on the air and not in jail) claiming its a conspiricy, sorry, I'm not buying it. The fact that those two suggest it indicates it is most likely NOT a conspiricy. With several ex-admin people now saying a lot of the same things, you gotta figure there may be some truth to it all.

Course, I have not read the book either....

Andrew

[DJD]

Scott was on The Factor tonight and it was awesome. Bill hit him hard and Scott came right back, great interview. After hearing Scott speak I think the Left is using him and Scott can't agree that's what's going on...he can't it's that simple. Scott claims that Bush is an honest man who he has affection for and he didn't want this to be a Bush bashing but more of a lets quit the constant campaining and do what's right for the country. Huh?? IMO his book is going to be viewed as a farce after the dust settles.
WMD's? Scott admitted that all the Intell both American and British said Iraq had it. The New York Times said it! George Tenant (Cia Director) agreed as far back as when he served under Clinton that Iraq had it and so did Bill Clinton back then! So did John Kerry, so did Hillary and the who's who of the political landscape why is it that people don't get that? Saddam's denial and lying and general history of deceit got him in trouble.
I feel sorry for Scott because IMO he realizes he made an error in judgement....a money making mistake but a mistake none the less. JMO!

[MsgMills]

When 9/11 happened and the President came on National TV and told the World that anyone involved would pay dearly.... American's loved it, The President had the gonads to take on All who threatened us and sent the troops into war....

Everyone involved with the intel the President had, the CIA, Briton Intel, Canada's Intel and everyone else who was asked about the WMD. They all said he (Saddam) was a threat and we went in and kicked his arse, captured him and then hung him for war crimes. Case closed...Now were getting Iraq set up to be able to run on it's own government. But it will take more time to get all the Terrorist who are keeping the Iraq Government from running the Country completely.

This McClellan dude is a money hungry creep in my book...If there wasn't money involved, he never would have came forward and said what he has said...Truth or not...Money talks and he took every cent he could get......

[DJD]

When 9/11 happened and the President came on National TV and told the World that anyone involved would pay dearly.... American's loved it, The President had the gonads to take on All who threatened us and sent the troops into war....

Everyone involved with the intel the President had, the CIA, Briton Intel, Canada's Intel and everyone else who was asked about the WMD. They all said he (Saddam) was a threat and we went in and kicked his arse, captured him and then hung him for war crimes. Case closed...Now were getting Iraq set up to be able to run on it's own government. But it will take more time to get all the Terrorist who are keeping the Iraq Government from running the Country completely.

This McClellan dude is a money hungry creep in my book...If there wasn't money involved, he never would have came forward and said what he has said...Truth or not...Money talks and he took every cent he could get......

Yikes! What has the world come to? A politician motivated by money? How can that be! LOL hadg Buddy.

[Moose1am]

Didn't Scott McClellan work for the Bush Adm for a Salary.. ie money.

The GOP was not bashing him when he was on Bush's side and working for MONEY

But now that he has turned on Bush and told the truth they bash him because he did it for the money?

Everyone works for money.

It appears that Scott McClellan got tired of working for a corrupt adm and lying though his teeth for Bush. He either quite or was let go but in any case he left that job.

But Scott was with Bush in TEXAS before Bush came to Washington. So it's pretty hard to say that Scott didn't know Bush very well.

All the thing that Scott has been CONFIRMING were already know for the most part.

Scott's inside the White House Position gave him intimate knowledge on how the Bush Adm worked. He was their Mouth Piece. Scott held one of the most important Political Position for the Bush Adm. He was the face of the Bush Adm. To say that he was not in the know sounds pretty shallow.

The truth has come out about how the Bush adm cherry picked intelligence and mislead the Americans into a 3 trillion dollar war that is giving us $4.00/gallon gas and higher natural gas cost. Higher food cost and a recession that the next President will have to deal with.

Yikes! What has the world come to? A politician motivated by money? How can that be! LOL hadg Buddy.

[DJD]

Yep he worked for them but I saw his interview with Oreilly and scott admitted these were his opinions on how things went. Bill said this book is not facts it's your opinions and Scott said to me it's what I saw.
All scott did was become a pawn for people helll bent on blaming everthing on the President even when the facts don't add up but it's an old argument.
Scott isn't much to speak of and if the Democrat party feels that this is the type of person they want to latch on to well then....birds of a feather flock together.

[Moose1am]

Your first mistake was turning on the Boob Tube.
Your second mistake was dialing into FOX NOISE
Their mistake was believing anything that that old Coot Oreilly has to say or do.

First hand testimony is accepted in a court of law and has been used as factual for as long as the English used Common Law.

So I would think that someone on the inside who saw and heard what they inside parties really said and thought would provide valuable insight into how those people govern

Combine that with other facts that Show the same things going on and you have a winning combination

By now everyone but the die hard Bush supporters know how corrupt the Bush adm has been. And even those die hards know deep down inside that this country is worse off for having Bush in the White house for these last 7 + years.

He is more of a disgrace now as he was when he was appointed to the Presidency by the GOP members of the Supreme.

We would have been much better off if Al Gore has been the President.

We have gone way down hill under bush.

Gas prices in the USA are over $4.00/gallon on average. And by the Th of July they could reach $5.00/gallon

Don't blame me as I didn't vote for Bush/Cheney.

Scott is one of the people that Bush trusted to deliver his propaganda. Who would know Bush better than Scott. LOL

I guess when you cheat an lie even your best friends turn against you.

Scott has nothing to gain from this other than the fact that now he can sleep at night. He won't be getting any more Christmas Cards from the Bush's though. Somehow I doubt that will bother him.

Yea Honest birds tend to fly with the other honest birds. Scott is now flying with the honey birds. He turned away from the Dishonest birds and joined the good guys.

Yep he worked for them but I saw his interview with Ore illy and Scott admitted these were his opinions on how things went. Bill said this book is not facts it's your opinions and Scott said to me it's what I saw.
All Scott did was become a pawn for people hell bent on blaming ever thing on the President even when the facts don't add up but it's an old argument.
Scott isn't much to speak of and if the Democrat party feels that this is the type of person they want to latch on to well then....birds of a feather flock together.

[Moose1am]

[QUOTE=jcb;328866]It's hard for me to conceive of a reality ,,

I am not sure that you know the difference between reality and fantasy!
In fact you confuse the two all the time


Funny how Scott was a prize pupil just a while ago and now that he's finally stopped lying for the Bush Adm they want to burn him at the stake.

I guess that the Bush Lovers expect everyone to be more loyal to the king that to America.

I for one am glad that Scott finally saw the light and came clean. There has never been a more corupt administration than the one we have now.

Just today the Senate hearings found that Bush had ignore intelligence and played up other intelligence information that proves that Bush has his mind made up about going to war with Iraq. Even though the 911 Hijackers had nothing what so ever to do with Iraq. They were all trained in Afganistan not Iraq. Saddam made sure that Al Queda didn't have any operations in Iraq.

[jcb]

[QUOTE=Moose1am;329324]

It's hard for me to conceive of a reality ,,

I am not sure that you know the difference between reality and fantasy!
In fact you confuse the two all the time

Way to snip off the rest of my quote, ignore the point I made because you can't refute it, and turn it into a personal attack without providing an example.

[Moose1am]

[QUOTE=jcb;329469]

Way to snip off the rest of my quote, ignore the point I made because you can't refute it, and turn it into a personal attack without providing an example.

----------------------------------------------------------------

I think you deserved a little of your OWN MEDICINE!