Come on, do you really think Cincy should be in one of the BCS Bowl games with their 10-2 record. Their not even in the class as Alabama, Florida, USC, or Okla....It's the Whole BCS debacle that let's weak teams become eligible to play in a BCS type game. Just like U of L did two tears ago when the Big East was so down and U of L went through the league like a cupcake League.

As far as IU going to the Bowl game, IU was predicted to finish next to last, last year in the league, but played their butts off and won 7 games and earned the right to play in their bowl game. I'd really like to see U of L play in the SEC or Big Ten and see exactly how they would fare each year....Two of the toughest Leagues going...

Now for Boise State and Utah, well they do play in weaker Leagues as well as did U of L when they were supposedly screwed over by the BCS Commish's.... But to go undefeated in College Football is a feat well deserved of any school and that undefeated record should get a little more reginition towards a National Title than say a team with 2 loss's playing in a BCS Bowl game....The Automatic right to play in a BCS Bowl game should not be determined solely on the winner of a so called BCS League. If that's the case then only the Teams who play in only the BCS Elgibil Leagues will always be the only ones to ever become the winner of the Championship Game....Then why should all the other teams who are not in these leagues even play College Football for, oh I forgot...They play so that the BCS League Teams can play weaker schools in order to pad their records with palying weaker schools... But yes, some weaker schools like Appl. State provide the occassional upset of a Major College team......