Search Fishin.com

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 25
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Pikeville/Lexington
    Posts
    1,362
    Post Thanks / Like

    Prehistoric fish

    I often hear people talk about "Prehistoric Fish' " such as the musky or pike or bowfin, snakehead and so on. But in reality all fish including largemouth and smallmouth are prehistoric. Ariving in the late Pleistocene, early holocene. These modern species have been around about 800,000 years. roughly 600,000 years longer than we humans have been on Earth. So next time you think about "prehistoric Fish" don't limit yourself to the standard train of thought, all fish are prehistoric.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    .
    Posts
    1,738
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Prehistoric fish

    I think what they mean is that fish such as bowfin and gar have changed very little for millions of years. btw, holocene started around 10,000 years ago, modern humans around 120,000 years, and earlier ancestors dating back some 6-8 million years.

    Andrew

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Pikeville/Lexington
    Posts
    1,362
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Prehistoric fish

    right, but the pleistocene started at 800,000 which is where these fish became prevalent on into the holocene which is around 10,000 years ago, I'm a geologist and new estimates are that modern humans arrived about 200,000.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Louisville
    Posts
    384
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Prehistoric fish

    Quote Originally Posted by MagikSmallie View Post
    right, but the pleistocene started at 800,000 which is where these fish became prevalent on into the holocene which is around 10,000 years ago, I'm a geologist and new estimates are that modern humans arrived about 200,000.
    That must be why I can't catch fish. They're smarter because they've got a 600,000 year head start on me.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Richmond
    Posts
    211
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Prehistoric fish

    I feel dumb..........

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    .
    Posts
    1,070
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Prehistoric fish

    Yep seen an drawing on a cave wall of the FNF rig must have been back 100,000 years ago---must have been Elwoods long lost kin lol

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Louisville
    Posts
    55
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Prehistoric fish

    Quote Originally Posted by MagikSmallie View Post
    right, but the pleistocene started at 800,000 which is where these fish became prevalent on into the holocene which is around 10,000 years ago, I'm a geologist and new estimates are that modern humans arrived about 200,000.


    Just when I thought I knew everything! LOL

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    .
    Posts
    313
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Prehistoric fish

    You guys really need to go fshing. Cabin fever has about got the best of you.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Shepherdsville, KY.
    Posts
    410
    Post Thanks / Like

    Thumbs up Re: Prehistoric fish

    Quote Originally Posted by biggw View Post
    Yep seen an drawing on a cave wall of the FNF rig must have been back 100,000 years ago---must have been Elwoods long lost kin lol
    LMFAO

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    2,538
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Prehistoric fish

    Quote Originally Posted by MagikSmallie View Post
    I often hear people talk about "Prehistoric Fish' " such as the musky or pike or bowfin, snakehead and so on. But in reality all fish including largemouth and smallmouth are prehistoric. Ariving in the late Pleistocene, early holocene. These modern species have been around about 800,000 years. roughly 600,000 years longer than we humans have been on Earth. So next time you think about "prehistoric Fish" don't limit yourself to the standard train of thought, all fish are prehistoric.
    By your definition, virtually all species on Earth are prehistoric. OK, I'll buy that, but the term isn't as meaningless as that. When you hear "prehistoric fish," think "living-fossil fish," because that's what the term is used for, fish that have existed virtually unchanged for millions of years. Gar fossils, for instance, go back to the Cretaceous.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    mt. washington, kentucky.
    Posts
    698
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Prehistoric fish

    Hey, I thought the world was only 6000 years old?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    584
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Prehistoric fish

    Technically youre correct but like previously stated...then pretty much all fish are "prehistoric fish".

    The term generally applies to gar and bowfin however. Bass, musky, snakeheads, and pike are relatively the new kids on the block compared to gar and bowfin!

Similar Threads

  1. Any one want any free fish for a fish fry?
    By JD7.62 in forum Kentucky Discussion Board
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-24-2011, 10:20 PM
  2. fish on or fish off at ROUGH??
    By lowranged94 in forum Kentucky Discussion Board
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-08-2007, 08:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •