
Originally Posted by
cra97
I fish quite a few tournaments myself, so I am as guilty as the rest of those you are speaking of here, but I am NOT probably in the majority when it comes to agreeing with you. I think there ARE TO MANY tourney's going on now! I have only been fishing these waters for a couple years now and I cannot believe how many events go out EVERY weekend. We are definately doing damage, in my humble opinion, to the prosperous fish population here in KY. I would rather they cut back on the number of events and increase the number of boats per event, to be honest. The high number of events being held each week cuts down on the entries into the events as well, and to me this hurts the tournament anglers as well. Do not get me wrong here, I do NOT think they should be done away with (tourney's), but I would love to see something even as progressive as ONE event per lake per day. Would that really kill the fun we tourney fisherman have? I have yet to fish any event on a weekend when there were not multiple, and sometimes that means like 5-7, events going out on the same body of water on the same day. This may not seem like a compromise, but I doubt some of the people who fish these "smaller" events would fish against the "big boys" (in other words those they think are to good to beat and thus fish events they do not on those days) and thus it would cut down not the OVERALL number of boats fishing the tournaments as a whole. I think this is a small, but first, step in the right direction.
I hate to see what has happened to a place like T-ville over the last 20, or so, years happen to more lakes in KY. The way I understand it, and I may be off here, T-ville used to be a "Trophy Lake" at one time, but now you can't catch very many KEEPERS, let alone "Trophy" fish. Most events I have seen take less than 12-15 lbs (and that's the MOST I have seen, generally 10 or so will get it done) to WIN. I was told it used to be common, or at least no unusual, to catch 5-7 lbers there. If someone comes in with a 5 lber now I am one of the MANY looking to see it and that's a shame in my opinion. This is just one example and I am sure there are many others people could point too but I have not been here long enough to point any others out right now.
I don't know if this thread will be "appreciated" by many, nor my response, but I would like to see some changes from where we are now. Thanks for sharing your opinion and I look forward to reading the responses this will draw.
Rob Appleby