Search Fishin.com

Results 1 to 12 of 37

Thread: Shad Post....

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    .
    Posts
    511
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Shad Post....

    Thank you Dave! You can only beat a dead horse for so long. It's easier to move a mountain then to move a person's opinion.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    .
    Posts
    207
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Shad Post....

    Dave, Peter, etc.;

    I am sorry to learn here that Fishin.com has taken the position in this long running debate that the majority of fisheries managers and lake managers are wrong, and that the issue is not something that should continue to be debated. I have often noted that the threads that contain this issue end up having some of the site's largest view counts. That would make it appear that a lot of people are at least reading about the issue, while only a few actually post. It would seem to me that from a site admin perspective you might want to see the discussion continue. I know as a lake manager I want the discussion to continue, even though I do appreciate that the insults and personal attacks get pretty silly at times. But even that keeps people aware of the issue, and may just make some of those readers who don't post to stop and think about things that they might otherwise not think about before they do something harmful to the resource.

    I wish people would understand that when someone in a management agency says that bass anglers may be responsible for some of the shad introductions, that is never, ever, meant to imply that all bass anglers are culpable. I know many bass anglers, and we host dozens of tournaments with some excellent clubs each year. Most of them are great folks and serious about their conservation ethic. I agree that it is not fair that so many times this issue gets discussed someone seems to always throw up the straw man argument that managers should not paint all bass anglers with the same brush. We don't. It is the people who throw up that argument that try to twist the topic into that shape, as you just did in your explanation of why you deleted the other thread. I personally see the bass tournament community as the best hope for getting this issue on the road to a resolution, but for that to happen they need to quit falling for that straw man ploy when someone throws it out there.

    All that said, I do appreciate your position that this is your board, and since you indicate here that you share the opinion that managers are wrong who press the idea that some bass anglers are do so stupid things based on misinformation. Your desire for "proof" before a discussion can take place makes this an unlikely spot for the discussion to continue. So be it. I regret that the people who so often come here to see this management discussion from both side will no longer be able to do so.

    I assume that since this post violates your TOS in that it does discuss board rules and comments, it is probable that my future access to the board will be denied. Please feel free to do that, as I will no longer be visiting Fishin.com anyway. Anyone out there who reads this before it gets taken down, feel free to contact me through my work email. If you know who I am and where I work, I'm sure you can find it online.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    .
    Posts
    36
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Shad Post....

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeAxsom View Post
    Dave, Peter, etc.;

    I am sorry to learn here that Fishin.com has taken the position in this long running debate that the majority of fisheries managers and lake managers are wrong, and that the issue is not something that should continue to be debated. I have often noted that the threads that contain this issue end up having some of the site's largest view counts. That would make it appear that a lot of people are at least reading about the issue, while only a few actually post. It would seem to me that from a site admin perspective you might want to see the discussion continue. I know as a lake manager I want the discussion to continue, even though I do appreciate that the insults and personal attacks get pretty silly at times. But even that keeps people aware of the issue, and may just make some of those readers who don't post to stop and think about things that they might otherwise not think about before they do something harmful to the resource.

    I wish people would understand that when someone in a management agency says that bass anglers may be responsible for some of the shad introductions, that is never, ever, meant to imply that all bass anglers are culpable. I know many bass anglers, and we host dozens of tournaments with some excellent clubs each year. Most of them are great folks and serious about their conservation ethic. I agree that it is not fair that so many times this issue gets discussed someone seems to always throw up the straw man argument that managers should not paint all bass anglers with the same brush. We don't. It is the people who throw up that argument that try to twist the topic into that shape, as you just did in your explanation of why you deleted the other thread. I personally see the bass tournament community as the best hope for getting this issue on the road to a resolution, but for that to happen they need to quit falling for that straw man ploy when someone throws it out there.

    All that said, I do appreciate your position that this is your board, and since you indicate here that you share the opinion that managers are wrong who press the idea that some bass anglers are do so stupid things based on misinformation. Your desire for "proof" before a discussion can take place makes this an unlikely spot for the discussion to continue. So be it. I regret that the people who so often come here to see this management discussion from both side will no longer be able to do so.

    I assume that since this post violates your TOS in that it does discuss board rules and comments, it is probable that my future access to the board will be denied. Please feel free to do that, as I will no longer be visiting Fishin.com anyway. Anyone out there who reads this before it gets taken down, feel free to contact me through my work email. If you know who I am and where I work, I'm sure you can find it online.
    Mike,
    You will be back. I guarantee it.... See you are reeding this post right now!

    I will miss your contradictions in your posts on this topic. "...when someone in a management agency says that bass anglers may be responsible for some of the shad introductions, that is never, ever, meant to imply that all bass anglers are culpable."

    ...??? So are you saying not all but most bass anglers????.... What are you saying????
    Also, if bass anglers "MAY be responsible", then they also MAY NOT be responsible either???... right???...

    Have a great day!!!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    .
    Posts
    2,303
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Shad Post....

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeAxsom View Post
    Dave, Peter, etc.;

    I am sorry to learn here that Fishin.com has taken the position in this long running debate that the majority of fisheries managers and lake managers are wrong, and that the issue is not something that should continue to be debated. I have often noted that the threads that contain this issue end up having some of the site's largest view counts. That would make it appear that a lot of people are at least reading about the issue, while only a few actually post. It would seem to me that from a site admin perspective you might want to see the discussion continue. I know as a lake manager I want the discussion to continue, even though I do appreciate that the insults and personal attacks get pretty silly at times. But even that keeps people aware of the issue, and may just make some of those readers who don't post to stop and think about things that they might otherwise not think about before they do something harmful to the resource.

    I wish people would understand that when someone in a management agency says that bass anglers may be responsible for some of the shad introductions, that is never, ever, meant to imply that all bass anglers are culpable. I know many bass anglers, and we host dozens of tournaments with some excellent clubs each year. Most of them are great folks and serious about their conservation ethic. I agree that it is not fair that so many times this issue gets discussed someone seems to always throw up the straw man argument that managers should not paint all bass anglers with the same brush. We don't. It is the people who throw up that argument that try to twist the topic into that shape, as you just did in your explanation of why you deleted the other thread. I personally see the bass tournament community as the best hope for getting this issue on the road to a resolution, but for that to happen they need to quit falling for that straw man ploy when someone throws it out there.

    All that said, I do appreciate your position that this is your board, and since you indicate here that you share the opinion that managers are wrong who press the idea that some bass anglers are do so stupid things based on misinformation. Your desire for "proof" before a discussion can take place makes this an unlikely spot for the discussion to continue. So be it. I regret that the people who so often come here to see this management discussion from both side will no longer be able to do so.

    I assume that since this post violates your TOS in that it does discuss board rules and comments, it is probable that my future access to the board will be denied. Please feel free to do that, as I will no longer be visiting Fishin.com anyway. Anyone out there who reads this before it gets taken down, feel free to contact me through my work email. If you know who I am and where I work, I'm sure you can find it online.
    First of all let me say this....fishin.com has not taken any position on this matter. The post was deleted by ME...not Peter or anyone else. I am a volunteer moderator for this site. As a moderator I am charged to enforce the rules of the site...and I am not going to let a thread stay on the board when folks start slamming one another or name callling one another....period. Now, if you think that we should leave those type threads up for the kids that visit this site to read just so we can get a hit count or because some folks are interested in reading those kind of threads..then you are dead wrong.

    As far as my thowing up a "straw dog", that is far from the truth. Fact is I said in my post (my opinion..I'll say that again MY OPINION) that some bass anglers may be responsible for the introduction of the shad and I also offered another possible source of the problem could be those dumping their unused minnows in the lake. Now if offering an example of another possible source of the problem is not to your liking...I am sorry...but you as a fisheries manager should know that most of the time, when there is a problem concerning health of a fishery, that it is normally a combination of things to include many natural occurances.

    Since I make my living and have for many years on the water as a guide and angler, I think I am more than a little qualified to give my opinion. I probably have more time on the water in the past year than you do in the past 20 years...and I did not become a nationally recognized bass fishing guide without know just a little about what goes on in a fishery nor without having read and learned extensively about fish, habitat, invasive species, etc. etc..etc...it may surprise you that I actually get paid to teach classes about fishing that are focused on shad and that one of the things that I teach in my classes is the detrimental effect that overpopulations of shad can have on a fishery, especially in your part of the country. As I said before, the source of contamination of shad could be from over zealous bass anglers AND people that are unknowingly and ignorantly dumping some shad minnows in the water instead of on the land when they are finished fishing with their live bait and have some left.

    I have no proof of either...nor do you...all we have is opinions....and opinions won't solve the problem you are having...only actions will.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Greenwood, IN
    Posts
    42
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Shad Post....

    As to the comment about Patoka and the downhill fishing.....

    BFL last weekend took 21 pounds to win and I was talking with another person who finished in the top 10 who stated he had 15 keepers during the tournament...

    21 pounds may make the cut this weekend for the FLW Cup and those are the best anglers out there!!!

    The fishing is not that bad if you know how and where to catch them.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    306
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Shad Post....

    Quote Originally Posted by Lucky1 View Post
    As to the comment about Patoka and the downhill fishing.....

    BFL last weekend took 21 pounds to win and I was talking with another person who finished in the top 10 who stated he had 15 keepers during the tournament...

    21 pounds may make the cut this weekend for the FLW Cup and those are the best anglers out there!!!

    The fishing is not that bad if you know how and where to catch them.
    The downhill fishing at Patoka was referring to panfishing, not necessarily bass fishing. I've got a good friend who's a tournament fisherman and he's caught lunker bass out of there. But since the gizzard shad emerged at Patoka, the bluegill, redear and even crappie fishing have detiorated tremendously.

    I'm a panfisherman and I live about 60 miles from Patoka, and I seriously wouldn't go there if you offered to pick me up and pay for the bait. I'd have you drop me off at a number of spots before I'd go there.

Similar Threads

  1. Big Shad
    By oldmanboat in forum Kentucky Discussion Board
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-09-2011, 06:21 PM
  2. red eye shad
    By coombro in forum Kentucky Discussion Board
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-09-2011, 05:00 PM
  3. Following the shad
    By bob46 in forum Kentucky Discussion Board
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-19-2009, 08:45 PM
  4. Red eye shad
    By wishniwasfishn in forum Kentucky Discussion Board
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-22-2008, 08:53 PM
  5. Cumberland shad ?
    By Fishwright in forum Kentucky Discussion Board
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-27-2006, 05:57 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •