Again Grumpy, 100% right on!!!

It is amazing, when President Bush was still in office, every single service man/woman that was killed in Iraq caused a headline like:

"President's troop surge results in...... deaths."

Now with President Obama's surge in Afganastan, all we here is a small blurb about a death or something. No blame assigned like they did to Pres. Bush.

Our media is as biased as they come.

tight lines,

hdf


Quote Originally Posted by Grumpy View Post
"The White House is predicting a 10-year federal deficit of $9 trillion--more than the sum of all previous deficits since America's founding. And it says by the next decade's end the national debt will equal three-quarters of the entire U.S. economy."

Even the Obama administration is finally admitting we are BROKE. But the WH and its Democrat controlled media are still down-playing it. If that had happened under Bush or any Republicn administration it would have been front page, BANNER HEADLINE NEWS. Instead the Courier-Journal has it as a side column on page B-6.

There has been a lot of talk (and print) lately about comparrisons with the NAZIs and I have to carry that one step further. Our media has definately studied the writings of Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi Minister or Propoganda, who said it is better to lie by OMISSION rather than comission. So when you print something that is unfavorable to the administration to tell the truth but to put in in small print on the inside of the newspaper. A Republican does something bad or a Democrat does something good, its headline news on the front page, but when a Republican does something good or a Democrat does something bad, its in small print on an inside page of an inside section. This is nothing new for the C-J, they have been doing it since I first subscribed.

Grumpy