Obama wants to Brainwash Our Kids Now

[GeoFisher]

Bush 1 did the same thing.....and HAD the SAME REACTION........

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...id-political-a

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...2.4be01a1.html

http://www.tonysrants.com/national/p...ss-to-schools/

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...ess-school-ch/

And look at that pic of LOSER_Hardt............Kinda of looks like the OLD people at town hall meetings, don't you think.

Political PANDERING does not belong in the SCHOOLS.........

Col......I'd love to hear your opinion of the material next week, after the presentation. You're right, it might be NOTHING.......but on the other hand, it might be SOMETHING, and something SCARY.......

I know some other teachers in the system.....some are for it, some are against it.

Finally......My take on it is this.........Yea, other presidents have done it....BUT, this president is SO FAR out of TOUCH that it SCARES me.

Thanks,

Geo

[Col Forbin]

I completely agree with your mindset Col...until you start doing the same thing the dimocrat party leaders are doing right now. Hanging labels on people who disagree with you, trying to make them look hateful and stupid.

Totally didn't mean to hang labels. I just think that the extreme hatred of our president to the point that you would not let your children listen to the leader of this country speak - goes against everything our politcal system stands for (so I do see it as borderline Unamerican, and Unpatriotic). Disagree with my views all you want, disagree with the president views all you want. Teach your children your views all you want - that is totally understandable. But to not allow your child to see the president speak because you don't agree with him is not teaching the right message about our political system.

Geo - I will discuss it next week. Whichever way it goes - I don't think our opinion will vary as much as you think. (I hope not, at least). I don't want to see a politically/agenda driven speech to students any more than you do.

[RoadToad]

Kind of like using the word "dimocrat".

Exactly! This is something that's been bugging me about this board lately, seeing people using epithets like this, and then expecting the people they're talking about to respond respectfully. Or maybe they don't expect that, and what they're trying to do is provoke someone, I don't now. But you may as well walk up to someone on the street and say, "Hey Stupid, how ya doing?" and expect to get a handshake in response. It certainly has no place in civil conversation, and as far as I am concerned, you may as well be wearing a button that says, "I am a bigot." bigot –noun a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bigot

[bassiusmaximus]

I think some of you are just being crazy about this. If you are so concerned with anyone having any influence on your children other than you - you always have the option to homeschool. Whoever stated the purpose of school is to teach unopinionated facts - you are dead wrong. If that was the case - why don't you buy a set of encyclopedias and start reading it to them. The purpose of schools is to prepare children for a successful future. Do you think sheltering them from any and all opinions/views that differ from your own is aiding in that.

I am a teacher - and I am eagerly awaiting this. Although I didn't agree with most of what GW did - if he had done the same thing - I would have been just as excited about it. I never bring my views into the classroom, however, I respect the office and position of the president - and to shelter your children from hearing the elected president is silly. This is a great educational opportunity - I said it before - I wish every president did this (regardless of affiliation).

Some of you sound like you are becoming paranoid to the point that it is clouding your rational thoughts. Geez -A president of the united states is speaking to the children of this country, and you are not letting them listen to it. Some of you are starting to sound like Anarchists, full of hate, unpatriotic, and UnAmerican (if that is a word).

You verified my point. Thanks. One your a teacher and a liberal democrat. Two you obviously feel obligated or unrestricted to enject your opinion upon your students on whatever subject is being discussed. This would be fine if they were in a class called political theory. And unless the students signed up to attend that class I don't feel you should be doing so regardless of political affiliation. And as you refer to 'sheltering them from any and all opinions other than my own is aiding that" well if I am present to give them another point of view then it wouldn't be a problem, but in a classroom there aren't any other adults present to do so. Yes I shelter them from what I deem to be bad influences as I am the parent. And I make that determination. Thats why they don't watch porn, rated movies, read materials I don't think is appropriate, stay out past dark or go anywhere that I don't approve of etc... They don't hang around with terrorist or communist, drug dealers, they don't go to a church where the pastor puts down white people or other races, and the United States, they won't be able to use the "I didn't know" excuse to hide or justify such affiliations.
Like I said if it was about staying of drugs, applying yourself in school or being patriotic then I wouldn't object. But to attempt to enlist them into some activist activity for whatever reason is wrong. And I see too much of an opportunity for this to take place.
This is america and I will support the president but not blindly support him. I support other adults in my community as well but if you think I will let my two daughters stay in a room behind closed doors with any adult without me being present your gravely mistaken. And I don't care who they are. Not even my best friend would be doing so. Does this make me paranoid? Mine and every other americans number one patriotic duty is to defend the constitution. And when I feel the two collide the constitution will get my allegiance thus the term to defend against all enemies foreign and domestic. And I am a veteran and a former police officer and have fought for my country against foreign enemies as well as domestic ones. So after I voice my opinion I am being unamerican, unpatriotic, an anarchist? Well I have fought for my right to say what I believe and for everyone else to do so as well ....now that's ironic.

[Tim_T]

Will our president teach the kids the way Hitler did with his wonderful youth movement? Will he teach them how to say Seig Hiel and all of the good things that go along with socialism and communism? Just curious.

[DJD]

With all the things wrong that this "FOOL" is associated with and the Dims playing the race card at every chance and the Dim leaders using names against anyone who does not agree with them you expect respect for the party or the "FOOL" in charge? Get real....

[Col Forbin]

I've never "enjected" my opinion on anyone - (I don't think so - I don't really know what that means) Did you read my post - I never talk politics in the classroom. However, after working in all grade levels, some of you are starting to remind me of my kids in my elementary days on the playground. "If I don't get to be pitcher, I'm not playing." I know it sounds funny, but many of you seem to be echoing that. My guy didn't win, so I want no part of this system.

Not allowing your child to hear the president speak, is just plain stupid. About as mature as comparing an Elected president to Hitler.

[bassiusmaximus]

Pardon me but I believe your the one who started and is still doing the name calling like elementary kids do on the playground. You obviously can't even control yourself and what you say. But yet accuse others of the same.
I wonder what you say or would say to kids in school behind closed doors......Thats pathetic.

[Col Forbin]

I don't think I ever called anyone anything. I said not letting a child see the president speak is plain stupid. Never called anyone stupid - just would be a stupid decision to make. I also said it was immature to compare the president to Hitler (It is). I can talk rationally about this all day long - YOU are putting words in my mouth. I have had some disagreements on this board plenty of times, but I still like almost everyone on here - no matter how much we disagree - this is a debate right - it would be boring if we all agreed.

HOWEVER, attacking my professionallism is uncalled for and ticks me off to no end. There is no excuse for that, other than you have nothing substantial to say.

[bassiusmaximus]

I don't think I ever called anyone anything. I said not letting a child see the president speak is plain stupid. Never called anyone stupid - just would be a stupid decision to make. I also said it was immature to compare the president to Hitler (It is). I can talk rationally about this all day long - YOU are putting words in my mouth. I have had some disagreements on this board plenty of times, but I still like almost everyone on here - no matter how much we disagree - this is a debate right - it would be boring if we all agreed.

HOWEVER, attacking my professionallism is uncalled for and ticks me off to no end. There is no excuse for that, other than you have nothing substantial to say.

Well cry me a river about your "professionalism". Expect more of the same if you attack my Patriotism or my dedication to this country again. Which you have done and that does more than "Tick me off."

[Devils Horse]

Kind of like using the word "dimocrat".

Yeah. Just like that.

[kyfanatic]

So do you guys think Jeramiah Wright,Tony Rezko,Franklin Raines,William Ayers,Louis Farrakhan,and Muammar el-Qaddafi are good role models that our school children should listen to Obama and try to immulate?