Yawn....zzzzzzzzzzz.
| Search Fishin.com |
Senior Member
Yawn....zzzzzzzzzzz.
Senior Member
Sorry you feel that way bug..........Originally Posted by bassin_bug
I hope I'm WRONG.......but unfortunately, I don't believe I am.
Later,
Geo
Senior Member
Now youre getting the pleasure of its response!
Senior Member
Re: Interesting Cancer suvivor Rates.
Now youre getting the pleasure of its response!
As usual, you just blow off some stupid crap not related to the topic.
Unlike YOU, I take the time to think before I give an answer on serious topics. His answer was directed toward me and I don't need you answering for me. I know a lot more about cancer than you do. Surprise us all and tell us in one word, or less, what you know about cancer.
I am a cancer survivor........TWICE.
Senior Member
Happy to hear you beat it twice Bug.My mom has done the same thing and it has been a scary ride each time.
I'm not comfortable with Doctors after going through what we just did with my dad. Just like any profession you have good and bad.....and that really sukks for the people who are faced with terrible diseases.
Senior Member
This is scary in my opinion. Yes there are alot of variables. But early detection is the key and for me that isn't a debate.
More big Government playing God, this administration will go down in history as the biggest collection of complete idiot Morons that has ever been assembled.
Senior Member
Happy to hear you beat it twice Bug.
I'm not comfortable with Doctors after going through what we just did with my dad. Just like any profession you have good and bad.....and that really sukks for the people who are faced with terrible diseases.
The last time I had cancer was over six years ago and I am fine; I don't even think about it. Fortunately for me, after the initial shock, a calming peace settled over me and I was never afraid. The second cancer was a different type than the first and neither was breast cancer; after surgery I didn't need further treatment. One was Level III.
The reason I mentioned breast cancer is because the CDC is not in the habit of revealing statistics on teenage girls who have it. Statistics are scarce on the number of men who also get it. It seems to me like they think only middle-age and elderly have the disease. jmo
Senior Member
Im curious what you were thinkin when you yawned and zzzzzzzed? Guess that means tomorrow.Im trying to figer you out and I just about got it.
Senior Member
The reason I feel the way I do is the truth is seldom told because, if it was, the American Cancer Society and Cancer Research Centers would be out of grant money. Another reason is because doctors don't always tell their patients the truth and almost every research project that has come out has turned out to be bogus. Aside from cancer research, do you remember things like 'eggs cause too much cholesterol,' and they made it sound like if you tasted an egg you would fall over dead with a heart attack; now they say eggs pose no threat to the heart. More than 2 cups of coffee a day was bad for your heart, now it's good for it. Two glasses of wine a day was good for the heart; now wine provides no greater benefits to the heart than eating grapes; actually fresh grapes provide greater nutrition. Cancer research started before the space program. If the United States can put a man on the moon, why haven't researchers already found a cure for cancer?
Did you see the report yesterday morning about various charities, hard working people were donating money to, and where a huge chunk of the money was going? Expensive fundraisers paid for by donors, automobiles, expense accounts, and large salaries. The director of the United Way was giving herself approximately $750,000 a year in salary; she has recently been fired because she had already been warned twice. Her replacement gave herself a $150,000/year salary. I won't list the others but this is an example. One religious charity is paying its director $1.7 million/year in salary.
According to the CDC, breast cancer patients average survival rate is 5 years but reports released Monday said women under age 50 didn't need a mammogram but every 2 years. Are we to take it that people under 50 don't get breast cancer? What if someone gets it right after their mammogram and have waited 2 years to find out they have it, already in advanced stages? I have a friend who said when she was 19 years old, married for a year and pregnant was told she had terminal breast cancer. She had surgery, and was advised to abort the baby because the chemotherapy would kill it. She refused to abort or have chemo treatments; both are alive and healthy and it has been 40 years. My sister was 25 years old and had a sore lymph node. The doctor told her it was malignant but hadn't spread; she went to New Orleans for precautionary treatment and they told her she didn't have anything to worry about because the cancer was gone. Exactly 6 months later she died and left two babies, still in diapers, without a mother; they cried for 2 years and ripped the sheets off the beds looking for her.
Cancer treatments are a moneymaker for doctors and hospitals and cancer patients are caught in the crossfire because they are the victims. My sister-in-law had lung cancer and spent around a million dollars on treatments over a two-year period. When she told the doctor that she was broke he told her he would see if there was something else he could do. The next day he called and said he checked and new "research" showed she had already received sufficient chemo. A month later she was sitting on the sofa having tea with a relative when she fell over. She was taken to the hospital and died the next day.
There is so much conflicting information on cancer causes, survival and death rates, nobody knows what the truth is. imo
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote